Department of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 207 S Martin Jischke Dr, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Project Engineer, RK&K, 651 East Park Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17111, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 9;22(8):2885. doi: 10.3390/s22082885.
Work zone safety is a high priority for transportation agencies across the United States. Enforcing speed compliance in work zones is an important factor for reducing the frequency and severity of crashes. This paper uses connected vehicle trajectory data to evaluate the impact of automated work zone speed enforcement on three work zones in Pennsylvania and two work zones in Indiana. Analysis was conducted on more than 300 million datapoints from over 71 billion records between April and August 2021. Speed distribution and speed compliance studies with and without automated enforcement were conducted along every tenth of a mile, and the results found that overall speed compliance inside the work zones increased with the presence of enforcement. In the three Pennsylvania work zones analyzed, the proportions of vehicles travelling within the allowable 11 mph tolerance were 63%, 75% and 84%. In contrast, in Indiana, a state with no automated enforcement, the proportions of vehicles travelling within the same 11 mph tolerance were found to be 25% and 50%. Shorter work zones (less than 3 miles) were associated with better compliance than longer work zones. Spatial analysis also found that speeds rebounded within 1-2 miles after leaving the enforcement location.
工作区安全是美国各地交通机构的首要任务。在工作区执行速度合规是减少事故频率和严重程度的一个重要因素。本文使用连接车辆轨迹数据评估了自动化工作区速度执法对宾夕法尼亚州的三个工作区和印第安纳州的两个工作区的影响。分析是在 2021 年 4 月至 8 月期间,对超过 3 亿个数据点和超过 710 亿条记录进行的。在每十分之一英里处进行了速度分布和速度合规性研究,有和没有自动化执法的研究结果发现,随着执法的存在,工作区内部的整体速度合规性有所提高。在分析的三个宾夕法尼亚工作区中,允许的 11 英里/小时容差范围内行驶的车辆比例分别为 63%、75%和 84%。相比之下,在印第安纳州,没有自动化执法的州,允许的 11 英里/小时容差范围内行驶的车辆比例分别为 25%和 50%。较短的工作区(小于 3 英里)比较长的工作区更符合规定。空间分析还发现,在离开执法地点后 1-2 英里内速度会反弹。