Health Services Research and Development and Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1400, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):720-5. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.720.
Brief intervention for patients with unhealthy alcohol use is a prevention priority in the United States, but most eligible patients do not receive it. This study evaluated an electronic alcohol-counseling clinical reminder at a single Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.
The systems-level intervention evaluated in this study consisted of making the clinical reminder, which facilitated medical record documentation of brief intervention among patients who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use, available to providers on one (of two) randomly selected hallways. Secondary electronic data were extracted for all patients who visited the clinic (October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2005). The proportion of patients with clinical-reminder use was evaluated among patients who screened positive for unhealthy drinking and were assigned to intervention hallway providers ("descriptive cohort"). Adjusted logistic regression evaluated the association between the intervention and resolution of unhealthy drinking at follow-up among all screen-positive patients who completed a second Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption questionnaire 18 months or longer after the first ("outcomes cohort").
Eligible patients (N= 22,863) included 10,392 controls and 12,471 in the intervention group. Fifteen percent (398 of 2,640) of descriptive cohort patients with unhealthy drinking had clinical-reminder use, which varied by severity (14% [n = 302 of 2,165] with mild/moderate and 20% [n = 96 of 475] with severe unhealthy drinking,p = .001). Only 39% (156 of 398) of patients with clinical-reminder use had documented brief intervention; advice to abstain was most common. Access to the clinical reminder was not significantly associated with resolution of unhealthy drinking in 1,358 patients in the outcomes cohort.
Availability of a clinical reminder to facilitate brief intervention did not, alone, result in substantial use of the clinical reminder. More active implementation efforts may be needed to get brief interventions onto the agenda of busy primary care providers.
在美国,对不健康饮酒患者进行简短干预是预防工作的重点,但大多数符合条件的患者并未接受干预。本研究评估了在退伍军人事务部(VA)综合医学诊所中实施的一种电子酒精咨询临床提醒措施。
本研究评估的系统干预措施包括提供临床提醒,以便在筛选出有不健康饮酒风险的患者中记录简短干预措施。该临床提醒仅在两个过道中的一个(随机选择)提供给医生。次要电子数据提取自 2002 年 10 月 1 日至 2005 年 9 月 30 日期间所有就诊的患者。对筛选出有不健康饮酒风险且被分配到干预过道医生处就诊的患者(描述性队列)中,评估了临床提醒的使用比例。对所有完成了第二次饮酒障碍识别测试(AUDIT-C)调查问卷且间隔时间为 18 个月或更长的筛选阳性患者(结局队列),使用调整后的逻辑回归评估了干预与随访时不健康饮酒解决情况之间的关联。
合格患者(N=22863)包括 10392 名对照和 12471 名干预组患者。描述性队列中 15%(398/2640)有不健康饮酒的患者使用了临床提醒,其使用比例因严重程度而异(14%[n=302/2165]为轻度/中度和 20%[n=96/475]为重度,p=.001)。仅 39%(398 名患者中的 156 名)使用临床提醒的患者记录了简短干预措施,最常见的是建议戒酒。在结局队列的 1358 名患者中,获得临床提醒与解决不健康饮酒之间无显著关联。
提供临床提醒以促进简短干预本身并不能显著增加临床提醒的使用。可能需要更积极的实施措施,以便将简短干预纳入忙碌的初级保健提供者的议程。