Wu Li-Tzy, Payne Elizabeth H, Roseman Kimberly, Kingsbury Carla, Case Ashley, Nelson Casey, Lindblad Robert
Duke University School of Medicine, US.
The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, US.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Aug 1;7(1):35. doi: 10.5334/egems.293.
The use of electronic health records (EHR) data in research to inform recruitment and outcomes is considered a critical element for pragmatic studies. However, there is a lack of research on the availability of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment data in the EHR to inform research.
This study recruited providers who used an EHR for patient care and whose facilities were affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse's National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (NIDA CTN). Data about providers' use of an EHR and other methods to support and document clinical tasks for Substance use screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) were collected.
Participants (n = 26) were from facilities across the country (South 46.2%, West 23.1%, Midwest 19.2 percent, Northeast 11.5 percent), representing 26 different health systems/facilities at various settings: primary care (30.8 percent), ambulatory other/specialty (26.9 percent), mixed setting (11.5 percent), hospital outpatient (11.5 percent), emergency department (7.7 percent), inpatient (3.8 percent), and other (7.7 percent). Validated tools were rarely used for substance use screen and SUD assessment. Structured and unstructured EHR fields were commonly used to document SBIRT. The following tasks had high proportions of using unstructured EHR fields: substance use screen, treatment exploration, brief intervention, referral, and follow-up.
This study is the first of its kind to investigate the documentation of SBIRT in the EHR outside of unique settings (e.g., Veterans Health Administration). While results are descriptive, they emphasize the importance of developing EHR features to collect structured data for SBIRT to improve health care quality evaluation and SUD research.
在研究中使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据以指导招募和评估结果被认为是务实研究的关键要素。然而,关于EHR中物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗数据用于研究的可用性方面的研究却很缺乏。
本研究招募了在患者护理中使用EHR且其机构隶属于美国国立药物滥用研究所的国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络(NIDA CTN)的医疗服务提供者。收集了有关医疗服务提供者使用EHR以及其他支持和记录物质使用筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)临床任务的方法的数据。
参与者(n = 26)来自全国各地的机构(南部46.2%,西部23.1%,中西部19.2%,东北部11.5%),代表了26个不同的处于各种环境的卫生系统/机构:初级保健(30.8%)、门诊其他/专科(26.9%)、混合环境(11.5%)、医院门诊(11.5%)、急诊科(7.7%)、住院部(3.8%)以及其他(7.7%)。经过验证的工具很少用于物质使用筛查和SUD评估。结构化和非结构化的EHR字段通常用于记录SBIRT。以下任务使用非结构化EHR字段的比例较高:物质使用筛查、治疗探索、简短干预、转介和随访。
本研究是同类研究中首个调查在独特环境(如退伍军人健康管理局)之外的EHR中SBIRT记录情况的研究。虽然结果是描述性的,但它们强调了开发EHR功能以收集SBIRT结构化数据以改善医疗质量评估和SUD研究的重要性。