Newburn G M, Fraser A R, Menkes D B, Mullen P E
Department of Psychiatry, Rotorua Hospital.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;24(4):475-9. doi: 10.3109/00048679009062902.
The antidepressant efficacy and side-effect profile of amitriptyline were compared to those of moclobemide, a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor with selectivity for the type A isozyme. Forty nine patients with DSM-III major depression were randomly assigned to receive either amitriptyline or moclobemide. Thirty seven patients (amitriptyline n = 16, moclobemide n = 21) completed the six week protocol, which was conducted under double blind conditions. The results indicated a comparable antidepressant time course and efficacy for the two treatments. Amitriptyline produced significantly more sedation and antimuscarinic side-effects. Moclobemide appears to be a well tolerated antidepressant without the liability to produce significant postural hypotension and without the need for a tyramine-poor diet.
将阿米替林的抗抑郁疗效和副作用情况与吗氯贝胺进行了比较,吗氯贝胺是一种对A型同工酶具有选择性的可逆性单胺氧化酶抑制剂。49例符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中重度抑郁症诊断标准的患者被随机分配接受阿米替林或吗氯贝胺治疗。37例患者(阿米替林组16例,吗氯贝胺组21例)完成了在双盲条件下进行的为期六周的方案。结果表明,两种治疗方法的抗抑郁病程和疗效相当。阿米替林产生的镇静作用和抗毒蕈碱副作用明显更多。吗氯贝胺似乎是一种耐受性良好的抗抑郁药,不会导致明显的体位性低血压,也无需食用低酪胺饮食。