Bizière K, Berger M
Department of Clinical Research, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basle, Switzerland.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1990;360:59-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05332.x.
Two multicentre studies comparing moclobemide with imipramine under similar conditions in patients undergoing a major depressive episode (DSM-III) were combined in the present analysis. A total of 353 patients received moclobemide (300-600 mg/day) and 356 imipramine (100-200 mg/day). In each study, the antidepressant efficacy of the 2 drugs was comparable, and subgroup analysis showed that moclobemide and imipramine were equally effective in endogenous depression. The response rate did not appear to be influenced by sex, but patients older than 60 years tended to respond less well to both drugs than did those under 60. The conclusion from the 2 studies is that, contrary to what is frequently stated for monoamine oxidase inhibitors, moclobemide appears as effective as a tricyclic in treating endogenous depression.
在本次分析中,将两项多中心研究合并,这两项研究在相似条件下,对患有重度抑郁发作(DSM-III)的患者比较了吗氯贝胺与丙咪嗪的疗效。共有353例患者接受了吗氯贝胺(300 - 600毫克/天)治疗,356例患者接受了丙咪嗪(100 - 200毫克/天)治疗。在每项研究中,两种药物的抗抑郁疗效相当,亚组分析表明,吗氯贝胺和丙咪嗪在内源性抑郁中疗效相当。缓解率似乎不受性别的影响,但60岁以上的患者对两种药物的反应往往不如60岁以下的患者。两项研究得出的结论是,与单胺氧化酶抑制剂常被提及的情况相反,吗氯贝胺在治疗内源性抑郁方面似乎与三环类药物一样有效。