• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性引产与期待管理在宫颈条件良好的初产妇中的比较。

Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix.

机构信息

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):601-605. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b
PMID:20733441
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of labor between nulliparous women with a favorable cervix who underwent either elective labor induction or expectant management beyond 39 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of nulliparous women with a singleton gestation who had a favorable cervix (modified Bishop score of at least 5) and delivered between 2006 and 2008. Two hundred ninety-four nulliparous women who underwent elective induction of labor between 39 and 40 5/7 weeks of gestation were compared with 294 nulliparous women who were expectantly managed beyond 39 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

The primary outcome, cesarean delivery, was similar between the two groups (20.8% compared with 20.1%, respectively, P=.84), a result that did not change in multivariable analysis. There were also no significant differences in other maternal (eg, chorioamnionitis, meconium, operative vaginal delivery, third- and fourth-degree lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage), or neonatal (arterial cord pH less than 7.0, Apgar score less than 4 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission) outcomes. Women who underwent an elective labor induction did have longer duration in labor and delivery between admission and delivery (median 12.7 compared with 9.0 hours, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

For nulliparous women with a favorable cervix, elective labor induction has a similar chance of resulting in cesarean delivery as expectant management, although it appears to result in an increase in resource use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

比较宫颈条件良好的初产妇行选择性引产或妊娠 39 周后期待管理的分娩结局。

方法

对 2006 年至 2008 年期间宫颈条件良好(改良 Bishop 评分至少为 5 分)且单胎妊娠分娩的初产妇进行回顾性队列研究。将 294 例在 39~40 5/7 孕周行选择性引产的初产妇与 294 例妊娠 39 周后期待管理的初产妇进行比较。

结果

主要结局(剖宫产)在两组间相似(分别为 20.8%和 20.1%,P=.84),多变量分析结果亦如此。其他母体结局(如绒毛膜羊膜炎、胎便、经阴道助产、Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度裂伤、产后出血)和新生儿结局(脐动脉血 pH 值<7.0、5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<4 分、新生儿重症监护病房入住)也无显著差异。行选择性引产的产妇其入院至分娩的产程和分娩时间更长(中位数分别为 12.7 小时和 9.0 小时,P<.001)。

结论

对于宫颈条件良好的初产妇,选择性引产与期待管理的剖宫产几率相似,但似乎会增加资源的使用。

证据等级

Ⅱ级。

相似文献

1
Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix.选择性引产与期待管理在宫颈条件良好的初产妇中的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):601-605. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eb6e9b.
2
Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.选择性引产与期待管理在宫颈条件不佳的初产妇中的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):583-587. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820caf12.
3
Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.宫颈条件不佳的肥胖未产妇剖宫产风险:足月时择期引产与期待治疗对比
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):53.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.妊娠39周初产妇选择性引产与期待管理的比较:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001154.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
6
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
7
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.选择性在 39 周时引产与期待管理相比:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.病态肥胖女性的非医学指征引产与剖宫产风险增加无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.肥胖女性及其后代的择期引产与妊娠结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):12-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002408.
10
Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.选择性足月引产与期待管理的比较:母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):761-769. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6a4d0.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Spontaneous Labor beyond 39 Weeks among Low-Risk Expectantly Managed Pregnant Patients.预测低危期待管理的孕妇超过 39 周的自发性分娩。
Am J Perinatol. 2023 Dec;40(16):1725-1731. doi: 10.1055/a-2099-4395. Epub 2023 May 24.
2
Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.≥39 孕周肥胖孕妇选择性引产与期待管理的结局比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;37(7):695-707. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688471. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Clinical Impact of a Restrictive Labor Induction Approval Process.
限制性引产审批流程的临床影响
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(2):166-173. doi: 10.1159/000491084. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
4
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.选择性在 39 周对初产妇进行引产:对母婴风险的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0193169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193169. eCollection 2018.
5
Induction of labor versus expectant management of large-for-gestational-age infants in nulliparous women.初产妇中巨大儿引产与期待治疗的比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0180748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180748. eCollection 2017.
6
Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.宫颈评估:从古代医学到精准医学。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):51-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002106.
7
Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.妊娠合并糖尿病女性的分娩时机
Obstet Med. 2014 Mar;7(1):8-16. doi: 10.1177/1753495X13513577. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
8
Outcome of Induction and Associated Factors among Term and Post-Term Mothers Managed at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: A Two Years' Retrospective Analysis.吉姆马大学专科医院足月及过期妊娠母亲引产结局及相关因素:一项两年回顾性分析
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016 Mar;26(2):121-30. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i2.6.
9
Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women.足月未产妇非医学指征引产与期待治疗的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):103.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.054. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
10
Induction of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in low risk parturients.低危产妇引产与产后出血风险。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054858. Epub 2013 Jan 25.