MRC SDGP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Nov;35(12):2414-26. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.124. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
Choice impulsivity has been linked to dopamine function and is consistently observed in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a preference for smaller-immediate over larger-delayed rewards using choice-delay paradigms. More sophisticated delay discounting paradigms have yielded inconsistent results. Context and sample characteristics may have contributed to these variations. In this study we examine the effect of type (real vs hypothetical) and magnitude of reward as well as of variation in dopamine genes on choice impulsivity. We selected 36 male adolescents with ADHD-combined subtype (ADHD-CT) and 32 controls (mean age=15.42, SD=2.05) to form four roughly equally sized subgroups on the basis of DAT1(10/6) haplotype dosage (2 copies and <2 copies). Participants, who were also genotyped for the COMT(val158met) and DRD4(48bp-VNTR) polymorphisms, performed a hypothetical and a real-time discounting task and provided self-ratings of trait impulsivity. The ADHD-CT group discounted rewards more steeply than controls only in the hypothetical task, with delay, but not reward magnitude, influencing choices. They also rated themselves as more impulsive compared with controls. DAT1(10/6) dosage and the COMT(Val158Met) genotype predicted trait impulsivity and discounting rates in the hypothetical task, but not in the real-time task. Our results directly link variation in genes putatively influencing dopamine signaling in the prefrontal cortex (COMT(Val158Met)) and the striatum (DAT1(10/6)) with discounting rates in a hypothetical task (but not a real-time task) and self-ratings of trait impulsivity in ADHD-CT and healthy controls. The lack of magnitude effects in the hypothetical task suggests that discounting in this task may be influenced by different processes in ADHD-CT than in healthy controls.
选择冲动性与多巴胺功能有关,在注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)中始终通过选择延迟范式观察到,即对较小的即时奖励而不是较大的延迟奖励的偏好。更复杂的延迟折扣范式得出了不一致的结果。背景和样本特征可能导致了这些差异。在这项研究中,我们研究了奖励的类型(真实与假设)和大小以及多巴胺基因的变异对选择冲动性的影响。我们选择了 36 名男性 ADHD 混合型(ADHD-CT)青少年和 32 名对照(平均年龄=15.42,SD=2.05),根据 DAT1(10/6)单倍型剂量(2 个拷贝和 <2 个拷贝)形成四个大致相等大小的亚组。参与者还进行了 COMT(val158met)和 DRD4(48bp-VNTR)多态性的基因分型,他们执行了假设和实时折扣任务,并对特质冲动性进行了自我评分。只有在假设任务中,ADHD-CT 组比对照组更陡峭地折扣奖励,而延迟而不是奖励大小影响选择。他们还自我评估为比对照组更冲动。DAT1(10/6)剂量和 COMT(Val158Met)基因型预测了假设任务中的特质冲动性和折扣率,但不能预测实时任务。我们的研究结果直接将假设影响前额叶皮层(COMT(Val158Met))和纹状体(DAT1(10/6))中多巴胺信号的基因变异与假设任务中的折扣率以及 ADHD-CT 和健康对照组中的特质冲动性自我评分联系起来。假设任务中没有大小效应表明,在这个任务中,折扣可能受到 ADHD-CT 与健康对照组不同的过程的影响。