Suppr超能文献

一项关于不同种族和族裔人群反应率的系统文献回顾。

A systematic literature review on response rates across racial and ethnic populations.

机构信息

The Centre for Health and Policy Studies, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2010 May-Jun;101(3):213-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03404376.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review examining whether minority ethnic populations participate in surveys as actively as the majority ethnic population.

METHODS

A literature and grey literature search was conducted using five online databases as well as government databases and reports, including the search terms: survey response rates or non-response rates and racial or ethnic populations (White, African American, Asian, and Hispanic); survey modes or methods (mail, telephone, face to face, e-mail); and response bias (non-response bias, response bias or social desirability). The search was limited to English language and articles published from January 1990 to June 2009. Article exclusions were based on further inclusion and exclusion criteria.

SYNTHESIS

Thirty-five articles were identified on ethnicities and response rates to survey modes. Six articles compared survey mode and response rate for multiple ethnic populations. Response rates ranged from 22.0% to 68.8% in Whites, and in other ethnic groups ranged from 15.4% in African Americans to 70.9% in Latino Americans. Among the 29 articles that presented survey mode and response rate for a specific ethnicity, the highest response rate reported was from African Americans (92.5%) and the lowest was from Cambodian Americans (30.3%).

CONCLUSION

Response rate varied across studies but was similar across ethnicities. Response rate may be related to many factors, including survey mode, length of questionnaire, survey language and cultural sensitivity to content. Our review indicates that ethnic populations who participate in surveys are as likely to participate in research as Whites. In literature, data validity across ethnicity is still unknown and should be studied in the future.

摘要

目的

系统评价少数民族人群参与调查的活跃程度是否与多数族裔人群相当。

方法

使用五个在线数据库以及政府数据库和报告,结合搜索词“调查应答率或无应答率和种族或族裔人群(白种人、非裔美国人、亚裔和西班牙裔)”“调查模式或方法(邮件、电话、面对面、电子邮件)”“应答偏差(无应答偏差、应答偏差或社会期望)”进行文献和灰色文献检索。检索仅限于英语且发表日期在 1990 年 1 月至 2009 年 6 月之间的文章。根据进一步的纳入和排除标准排除文章。

结果

确定了 35 篇关于族裔和应答率与调查模式的文章。6 篇文章比较了多种族裔人群的调查模式和应答率。白种人的应答率范围为 22.0%至 68.8%,而非裔美国人的应答率范围为 15.4%,拉丁裔美国人的应答率范围为 70.9%。在 29 篇提出特定族裔的调查模式和应答率的文章中,报告的最高应答率来自非裔美国人(92.5%),最低的来自柬埔寨裔美国人(30.3%)。

结论

应答率因研究而异,但在族裔之间相似。应答率可能与许多因素有关,包括调查模式、问卷长度、调查语言和内容的文化敏感性。我们的综述表明,参与调查的族裔人群与白种人一样有可能参与研究。在文献中,族裔间的数据有效性仍不清楚,应在未来进行研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
The effect of multiple mailings on recruitment: the Multiethnic Cohort.多次邮寄对招募的影响:多民族队列研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Feb;17(2):447-54. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2576.
10
Predictors of depression in aging South Asian Canadians.加拿大南亚裔老年人抑郁的预测因素。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2008 Mar;23(1):57-75. doi: 10.1007/s10823-007-9051-5. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验