Epsilon Eta, Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Sep 1;42(3):234-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01357.x.
To systematically analyze evidence about the outcome and percent of newly completed ADs, focusing on the effectiveness of (a) types of educational interventions versus controls and (b) one educational intervention over another.
Systematic review of literature based on Cochrane review criteria.
Twelve randomized and four nonrandomized studies were selected from the nursing, medical, and social work literature that met the following criteria: described educational interventions, provided information to calculate the percent of newly completed ADs as an outcome, and published between 1991 and 2009. The review focused primarily on randomized studies. Reviewers calculated the percent of newly completed ADs by determining the number of subjects per group without an AD at baseline and the percentage of those who then completed one by the end of the studies.
Findings were inconsistent regarding all types of educational interventions studied versus controls. Sufficient evidence exists to conclude that combined written and verbal educational interventions were more effective than single written interventions in increasing the percent of newly completed ADs in adult clinic outpatients and hospitalized elderly.
Calculating the percent of newly completed ADs was successful in allowing for study result comparisons. Overall, the evidence base regarding the effectiveness of single or combined educational interventions in increasing AD completion is weak. Randomized studies with diverse samples should be conducted against controls before more studies comparing interventions are undertaken.
This article provides nurses with a summary of research related to educational interventions and AD completion and identifies where future study is needed.
系统分析关于结局和新完成 AD 比例的证据,重点关注以下两个方面的有效性:(a)不同类型的教育干预与对照的效果;(b)一种教育干预与另一种的效果。
基于 Cochrane 综述标准的文献系统评价。
从护理、医学和社会工作文献中选择了 12 项随机研究和 4 项非随机研究,这些研究符合以下标准:描述了教育干预措施,提供了计算新完成 AD 比例的信息,且发表时间在 1991 年至 2009 年之间。本综述主要关注随机研究。审查员通过确定基线时每组无 AD 的受试者人数以及研究结束时完成 AD 的人数比例来计算新完成 AD 的比例。
关于所有类型的教育干预与对照的研究,结果均不一致。有足够的证据表明,与单一书面干预相比,书面和口头相结合的教育干预更能有效提高成年门诊和住院老年人新完成 AD 的比例。
计算新完成 AD 的比例成功地允许对研究结果进行比较。总的来说,关于单一或组合教育干预措施增加 AD 完成率的有效性的证据基础很薄弱。应针对对照开展具有不同样本的随机研究,然后再开展比较干预措施的更多研究。
本文为护士提供了与教育干预和 AD 完成相关的研究总结,并确定了需要进一步研究的领域。