College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Library, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 18;9(9):e030275. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030275.
How advance care planning (ACP) is conceptualised in Australia including when, where and how ACP is best initiated, is unclear. It has been suggested that healthcare delivered in general practice provides an optimal setting for initiation of ACP discussions but uptake remains low. This systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis sought to answer two questions: (1) What are the barriers and enablers to uptake of ACP in general practice? (2) What initiatives have been used to increase uptake of ACP in general practice?
A systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature was undertaken. A socioecological framework was used to interpret and map the literature across four contextual levels of influence including individual, interpersonal, provider and system levels within a general practice setting.
Primary care general practice settings DATA SOURCES: Searches were undertaken from inception to July 2019 across Ovid Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, ProQuest and Cochrane Library of systematic reviews.
The search yielded 4883 non-duplicate studies which were reduced to 54 studies for synthesis. Year of publication ranged from 1991 to 2019 and represented research from nine countries. Review findings identified a diverse and disaggregated body of ACP literature describing barriers and enablers to ACP in general practice, and interventions testing single or multiple mechanisms to improve ACP generally without explicit consideration for level of influence. There was a lack of cohesive guidance in shaping effective ACP interventions and some early indications of structured approaches emerging.
Findings from this review present an opportunity to strategically apply the ACP research evidence across targeted levels of influence, and with an understanding of mediators and moderators to inform the design of new and enhanced ACP models of care in general practice.
CRD42018088838.
澳大利亚对预先医疗照护计划(ACP)的概念理解并不清晰,包括何时、何地以及如何最好地启动 ACP。有人认为,在全科医疗中提供的医疗保健为启动 ACP 讨论提供了最佳环境,但参与率仍然很低。本系统评价和批判性解释性综合旨在回答两个问题:(1)在全科实践中采用 ACP 的障碍和促进因素有哪些?(2)为了提高全科实践中 ACP 的采用率,采用了哪些举措?
对同行评议文献进行系统评价和批判性解释性综合。采用社会生态学框架,在全科医疗环境中,从个人、人际、提供者和系统四个层面的影响因素来解释和映射文献。
初级保健全科医疗环境
从成立到 2019 年 7 月,在 Ovid Medline、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Scopus、ProQuest 和 Cochrane 系统评价图书馆中进行了检索。
搜索结果排除重复后,共得到 4883 项非重复研究,最终纳入 54 项研究进行综合分析。发表年份从 1991 年到 2019 年不等,研究来自 9 个国家。综述结果发现,ACP 文献涵盖了全科实践中 ACP 的障碍和促进因素,以及测试改善 ACP 的一般干预措施,这些干预措施单独或多种机制同时作用,但没有明确考虑影响的程度。在制定有效的 ACP 干预措施方面缺乏一致的指导,一些早期的结构化方法也开始出现。
本综述的结果为有针对性地将 ACP 研究证据应用于有针对性的影响层面提供了机会,并了解了中介和调节因素,为设计新的和改进的全科医疗 ACP 护理模式提供了信息。
CRD42018088838。