选择行为对重度残疾学生严重问题行为的影响。
Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.
作者信息
Dyer K, Dunlap G, Winterling V
机构信息
May Institute, Chatham, Massachusetts 02633.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):515-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-515.
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of 3 students with severe autism and/or mental retardation. In the context of within-subject reversal designs, the results showed consistently reduced levels of problem behaviors (e.g., aggression) when the students were given opportunities to make choices among instructional tasks and reinforcers. Additional data showed no systematic differences in the rate of correct responding between the two conditions. The results are discussed in relation to the continuing search for effective, nonintrusive solutions to the occurrence of serious problem behavior.
摘要
本研究评估了选择行为对3名重度自闭症和/或智力障碍学生严重问题行为的影响。在被试内反转设计的背景下，结果显示，当给予学生在教学任务和强化物之间进行选择的机会时，问题行为（如攻击行为）水平持续降低。额外数据表明，两种条件下正确反应率没有系统差异。研究结果结合对严重问题行为发生的有效、非侵入性解决方案的持续探索进行了讨论。
相似文献
1
Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.选择行为对重度残疾学生严重问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):515-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-515.
2
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
3
Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.通过功能性沟通训练、消退和反应链减少逃避行为并提高任务完成率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):261-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-261.
4
Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.评估患有严重行为障碍儿童的自我控制能力和冲动性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):451-66. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-451.
5
Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.将自由时间的意外事件分析为正强化与负强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):247-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-247.
6
Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.使用图片评估发育障碍个体的强化物。
Behav Modif. 2003 Sep;27(4):470-83. doi: 10.1177/0145445503255602.
7
Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.在累进比率时间表下增强与偏好和非偏好工作人员互动的效果。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):221-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-221.
8
Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.累进比率和固定比率时间表下对强化物的偏好：单一安排与并发安排的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Summer;41(2):163-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-163.
9
Using objects of obsession as token reinforcers for children with autism.将痴迷对象用作自闭症儿童的代币强化物。
J Autism Dev Disord. 1998 Jun;28(3):189-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1026061220171.
10
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.针对幼儿严重行为问题的决策性治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.
引用本文的文献
1
Report of the ABAI Task Force on Contingent Electric Skin Shock.美国行为分析协会临时电皮肤电击特别工作组报告
Perspect Behav Sci. 2023 Jun 15;46(2):261-304. doi: 10.1007/s40614-023-00379-w. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Using Pivotal Response Treatment to Improve Language Functions of Autistic Children in Special Schools: A Randomized Controlled Trial.采用关键反应治疗改善特殊学校自闭症儿童的语言功能：一项随机对照试验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jun;54(6):2081-2093. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05988-7. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
A Survey-Based Method to Evaluate Optimal Treatment Selection for Escape-Maintained Problem Behavior.一种基于调查的方法，用于评估逃避维持的问题行为的最佳治疗选择。
Behav Anal Pract. 2017 Apr 7;10(3):214-227. doi: 10.1007/s40617-017-0180-1. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Learner Preference Between Massed- and Alternating-Trial Sequencing when Teaching Stimulus Relations to Children with Autism.在向自闭症儿童教授刺激关系时，集中式与交替式试验序列的学习者偏好。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Aug 31;10(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0140-1. eCollection 2017 Mar.
5
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism.一项关于关键反应训练（PRT）与成人主导的应用行为分析（ABA）干预对公立学校自闭症儿童破坏性行为影响的随机临床试验比较。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Sep;45(9):2899-907. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2451-4.
6
Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior: a treatment-selection model for practicing behavior analysts.针对逃避维持的问题行为的基于功能的治疗方法：行为分析师实践的治疗选择模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2010 Spring;3(1):22-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03391755.
7
Positive behavior support: Expanding the application of applied behavior analysis.积极行为支持：拓展应用行为分析的应用范围
Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;23(1):85-94. doi: 10.1007/BF03392001.
8
A tutorial on the concept of the motivating operation and its importance to application.关于动机操作概念及其应用重要性的教程。
Behav Anal Pract. 2009 Fall;2(2):22-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03391745.
9
A review of interventions to teach a mand repertoire.一项关于教授“要求”技能库的干预措施的综述。
Anal Verbal Behav. 1995;12:53-66. doi: 10.1007/BF03392897.
10
A comparison of the effects of providing activity and material choice to children with autism spectrum disorders.为自闭症谱系障碍儿童提供活动和材料选择的效果比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Winter;43(4):717-21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-717.
本文引用的文献
1
Effects of choice and immediacy of reinforcement on single response and switching behavior of children.选择和即时强化对儿童单一反应和转换行为的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):425-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-425.
2
The relation between choosing and working prevocational tasks in two severely retarded young adults.两名重度智障青年选择和从事职业前任务之间的关系。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;13(1):177-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-177.
3
The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers.自闭症刻板行为与常规及特别评估的强化物之间的竞争。
Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(4):607-26. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90056-4.
4
The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior.儿童偏好活动对自闭症儿童社交行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;20(3):243-52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-243.
5
Daily decision-making in community residences: a social comparison of adults with and without mental retardation.社区住宅中的日常决策：有智力障碍和无智力障碍成年人的社会比较。
Am J Ment Retard. 1988 Mar;92(5):430-5.
6
Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.识别重度残障人士的强化物：工作人员意见与偏好的系统评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31.
7
Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training.通过功能性沟通训练减少行为问题。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):111-26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.
8
Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps.自主选择工作与分配工作对重度残障人士工作表现的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):253-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-253.
9
Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.评估重度智力障碍者的食物偏好：提供做出选择的机会。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):183-95. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-183.
10
Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap.平衡康复训练权与个人自由权：发育障碍者吃过多甜甜圈和小睡的权利。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):79-89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-79.
Zotero 插件