Saini Valdeep, Betz Alison M, Gregory Meagan K, Leon Yanerys, Fernandez Nathalie
Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY USA.
Coastal Behavior Analysis' Center for Autism Research and Education, Vero Beach, FL USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2017 Apr 7;10(3):214-227. doi: 10.1007/s40617-017-0180-1. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Geiger, Carr, and LeBlanc (2010) developed a decision-making model for escape-maintained problem behavior that could be used to guide the course of treatment selection. We used a digital survey to evaluate the model's potential usefulness. We presented novice and expert practitioners' written hypothetical scenarios and asked them to determine the optimal treatment in a given situation. Some participants were given the model, whereas others were instructed to use their best clinical judgment. Using logistic regression analyses, the general findings for our scenarios were the following: (a) experts without the aid of a decision model had better odds of selecting the optimal treatment than novices without the decision model, (b) experts with the decision model did not have greater odds of selecting optimal treatment than experts without the model, and
盖革、卡尔和勒布朗(2010年)开发了一种用于逃避维持的问题行为的决策模型,该模型可用于指导治疗选择的过程。我们使用了一项数字调查来评估该模型的潜在有用性。我们向新手和专家从业者展示了书面假设情景,并要求他们确定给定情况下的最佳治疗方法。一些参与者获得了该模型,而其他参与者则被指示运用他们最佳的临床判断。通过逻辑回归分析,我们情景的总体结果如下:(a)没有决策模型帮助的专家比没有决策模型的新手有更好的选择最佳治疗方法的几率,(b)有决策模型的专家选择最佳治疗方法的几率并不比没有该模型的专家更高,并且