Louisy F, Gaudin C, Oppert J M, Güell A, Guezennec C Y
C.E.R.M.A. = Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches de Médecine Aérospatiale, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61(5-6):349-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00236052.
Venous distensibility of the lower limbs was assessed in six healthy men who were submitted twice successively to 1 month of -6 degrees head-down bedrest, with and without lower body negative pressure (LBNP) (LBNP subjects and control subjects, respectively). Venous capacity (delta Vv,max, in ml.100 ml-1) of the legs was determined by mercury strain gauge plethysmography with venous occlusion. Plethysmographic measurements were made on each subject before (Dc), during (D6 and D20) and after (5th day of recovery, D+5) bedrest. During bedrest, LBNP was applied daily, several times a day to the subjects submitted to this procedure. Results showed a gradual increase in Vv,max (ml.100 ml-1) throughout the bedrest, both in the control group [delta Vv,max = 2.11 SD 0.54 at Dc, 2.69 SD 0.29 at D6, 4.39 SD 2.08 at D20, 2.39 SD 0.69 at D+5, P less than 0.001 (ANOVA)] and in the LBNP group [delta Vv,max = 2.07 SD 0.71 at Dc, 2.85 SD 1.19 at D6, 3.75 SD 1.74 at D20, 2.43 SD 0.94 at D+5, P less than 0.001 (ANOVA)], without significant LBNP effect. These increases were of the same order as those encountered during spaceflight. It is concluded that -6 degrees head-down bedrest is a good model to simulate the haemodynamic changes induced by exposure to weightlessness and that LBNP did not seem to be a good technique to counteract the adverse effects of weightlessness on the capacitance vessels of the lower limbs. This latter conclusion raises the question of the role and magnitude of leg venous capacitance in venous return and cardiac regulation.
对6名健康男性的下肢静脉扩张性进行了评估,这些男性先后两次连续接受为期1个月的 -6度头低位卧床休息,一次有下体负压(LBNP)(分别为LBNP组受试者),一次无下体负压(对照组受试者)。通过带有静脉阻塞的汞应变片体积描记法测定腿部的静脉容量(ΔVv,max,单位为ml·100 ml-1)。在卧床休息前(Dc)、期间(D6和D20)以及之后(恢复第5天,D+5)对每个受试者进行体积描记测量。在卧床休息期间,每天多次对接受该程序的受试者施加LBNP。结果显示,在整个卧床休息期间,对照组 [Dc时ΔVv,max = 2.11±0.54,D6时为2.69±0.29,D20时为4.39±2.08,D+5时为2.39±0.69,P<0.001(方差分析)] 和LBNP组 [Dc时ΔVv,max = 2.07±0.71,D6时为2.85±1.19,D20时为3.75±1.74,D+5时为2.43±0.94,P<0.001(方差分析)] 的Vv,max(ml·100 ml-1)均逐渐增加,且LBNP无显著影响。这些增加与在太空飞行期间遇到的增加幅度相当。得出的结论是,-6度头低位卧床休息是模拟失重引起的血液动力学变化的良好模型,并且LBNP似乎不是抵消失重对下肢容量血管不利影响的良好技术。后一个结论提出了腿部静脉容量在静脉回流和心脏调节中的作用及大小的问题。