• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生、护士和管理人员的思维方式有差异吗?

Do doctors, nurses and managers have different thinking styles?

作者信息

Sladek Ruth M, Bond Malcolm J, Phillips Paddy A

机构信息

Research to Practice Group, Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2010 Aug;34(3):375-80. doi: 10.1071/AH09791.

DOI:10.1071/AH09791
PMID:20797372
Abstract

A study of the preferred thinking styles among senior health professionals is reported. A total of 49 medical consultants, 50 senior nurses and 53 health managers from two public teaching hospitals in Adelaide, Australia, were invited via a personal letter to complete a questionnaire comprising measures of thinking style (the Rational Experiential Inventory) and cognitive style (two dimensions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator). Managers reported a higher preference for 'rational' reasoning than nurses, whereas medical consultants reported a lower preference for 'experiential' reasoning than both managers and nurses. Cognitive style was largely homogenous. Although generalisation of the findings may be limited due to small sample sizes and the self-selection of participants, an understanding of the thinking styles of senior health professionals will likely inform the design and evaluation of future change strategies.

摘要

本文报告了一项关于资深医疗专业人员偏好的思维方式的研究。通过个人信件邀请了澳大利亚阿德莱德两家公立教学医院的49名医学顾问、50名资深护士和53名健康管理人员,让他们填写一份问卷,其中包括思维方式测量(理性经验量表)和认知方式测量(迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标的两个维度)。管理人员报告称,他们比护士更倾向于“理性”推理,而医学顾问报告称,他们比管理人员和护士都更不倾向于“经验性”推理。认知方式在很大程度上是同质的。尽管由于样本量小和参与者的自我选择,研究结果的普遍性可能有限,但了解资深医疗专业人员的思维方式可能会为未来变革策略的设计和评估提供参考。

相似文献

1
Do doctors, nurses and managers have different thinking styles?医生、护士和管理人员的思维方式有差异吗?
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Aug;34(3):375-80. doi: 10.1071/AH09791.
2
Why don't doctors wash their hands? A correlational study of thinking styles and hand hygiene.医生为什么不洗手?思维方式与手部卫生的相关性研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Aug;36(6):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.11.002.
3
An experiential thinking style: its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures.经验思维风格:其各个方面及其与客观和主观标准测量的关系。
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1043-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x.
4
An investigation of managerial characteristics of health care managers: a comparison study.医疗保健管理人员的管理特征调查:一项比较研究。
J Allied Health. 1987 Aug;16(3):237-46.
5
Temperament profiles in physicians, lawyers, managers, industrialists, architects, journalists, and artists: a study in psychiatric outpatients.医生、律师、经理、实业家、建筑师、记者和艺术家的气质特征:一项针对精神科门诊患者的研究。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.08.003.
6
Pilot study of Myers Briggs Type Indicator personality profiling in emergency department senior medical staff.
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Jun;17(3):200-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00723.x.
7
The changing nature of nursing work in rural and small community hospitals.农村及小型社区医院护理工作性质的变化
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;9(1):1089. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
8
Personality styles of first-year dental students.一年级牙科学生的性格类型。
J Dent Educ. 1986 Apr;50(4):221-4.
9
The determinants of quality in procedural rural medical care.农村医疗程序中医疗质量的决定因素。
Rural Remote Health. 2005 Oct-Dec;5(4):473. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
10
Perioperative nurses' ability to think critically.围手术期护士的批判性思维能力。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2010 Apr-Jun;19(2):137-46. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181dafec7.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiling health professionals' personality traits, behaviour styles and emotional intelligence: a systematic review.分析卫生专业人员的个性特征、行为风格和情商:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 18;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04003-y.
2
Defining Cyber Security and Cyber Security Risk within a Multidisciplinary Context using Expert Elicitation.使用专家启发式方法在多学科背景下定义网络安全和网络安全风险。
Risk Anal. 2022 Aug;42(8):1643-1669. doi: 10.1111/risa.13687. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
3
Managing small-scale commercial fisheries for adaptive capacity: insights from dynamic social-ecological drivers of change in Monterey Bay.
管理小规模商业渔业以增强适应能力:来自蒙特雷湾动态社会生态变化驱动因素的见解
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0118992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118992. eCollection 2015.