Suppr超能文献

高危心源性栓塞源且华法林使用剂量低于治疗范围的缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓治疗后的安全性和结局。

Safety and outcome after thrombolytic treatment in ischemic stroke patients with high-risk cardioembolic sources and prior subtherapeutic warfarin use.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital Integrative Research Institute for Cerebral and Cardiovascular Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2010 Nov 15;298(1-2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is a major complication of thrombolytic treatment. Concerns have been raised about the risk of hemorrhage in patients having received warfarin. Therefore, different indications for thrombolytic treatment are in use for stroke patients on warfarin. However, it remains uncertain whether the prior warfarin use actually increases their risk of bleeding in patients treated with thrombolysis.

METHODS

This study included 179 consecutive patients who had high-risk cardioembolic sources and received thrombolytic treatment. Patients were treated with intravenous thrombolytic agents, or underwent intraarterial thrombolysis if their international normalized ratio (INR) was ≤1.7. We compared the frequency of bleeding complications between patients with prior warfarin use and those without. We also investigated whether there were differences in functional outcome and recanalization rates between them.

RESULTS

A prior warfarin use was present in 28 patients (15.6%). Although INR levels were higher in the prior warfarin group, the frequency of bleeding complications was not different between patients who received prior warfarin and those who did not. No differences were observed in patients with or without prior warfarin use, for successful recanalization rate (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 2 or 3), mortality, or modified Rankin score (≤2) at 3months.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombolytic therapy for patients who previously received warfarin and had an INR≤1.7 did not affect bleeding risk, clinical outcome, or recanalization rate. Our data suggest that patients with a history of prior warfarin use may be safely treated with thrombolytic agents when their INR levels are low.

摘要

背景

出血是溶栓治疗的主要并发症。曾有研究对接受华法林治疗的患者出血风险表示担忧。因此,对于接受华法林治疗的脑卒中患者,溶栓治疗的适应证有所不同。然而,华法林的使用是否确实会增加溶栓治疗患者的出血风险仍然不确定。

方法

本研究纳入了 179 例具有高危心源性栓塞源且接受溶栓治疗的连续患者。患者接受静脉溶栓药物治疗,如果国际标准化比值(INR)≤1.7,则进行动脉内溶栓治疗。我们比较了有和无华法林使用史的患者出血并发症的发生率。我们还调查了他们之间的功能结局和再通率是否存在差异。

结果

28 例(15.6%)患者有华法林使用史。尽管华法林组的 INR 水平较高,但接受华法林治疗的患者与未接受华法林治疗的患者出血并发症的发生率并无差异。在成功再通率(心肌梗死溶栓治疗分级 2 或 3)、死亡率或 3 个月时的改良 Rankin 评分(≤2)方面,有和无华法林使用史的患者之间无差异。

结论

对于 INR≤1.7 的先前接受华法林治疗的患者,溶栓治疗不会影响出血风险、临床结局或再通率。我们的数据表明,当 INR 水平较低时,有华法林使用史的患者可以安全地接受溶栓药物治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验