Suppr超能文献

为生物医学研究生制定基于问题的学习(PBL)课程,以培养专业精神和科学诚信。

Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students.

机构信息

Division Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):614-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035220. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

Abstract

A multidisciplinary faculty committee designed a curriculum to shape biomedical graduate students into researchers with a high commitment to professionalism and social responsibility and to provide students with tools to navigate complex, rapidly evolving academic and societal environments with a strong ethical commitment. The curriculum used problem-based learning (PBL), because it is active and learner-centred and focuses on skill and process development. Two courses were developed: Scientific Professionalism: Scientific Integrity addressed discipline-specific and broad professional norms and obligations for the ethical practice of science and responsible conduct of research (RCR). Scientific Professionalism: Bioethics and Social Responsibility focused on current ethical and bioethical issues within the scientific profession, and implications of research for society. Each small-group session examined case scenarios that included: (1) learning objectives for professional norms and obligations; (2) key ethical issues and philosophies within each topic area; (3) one or more of the RCR instructional areas; and (4) at least one type of moral reflection. Cases emphasised professional standards, obligations and underlying philosophies for the ethical practice of science, competing interests of stakeholders and oversight of science (internal and external). To our knowledge, this is the first use of a longitudinal, multi-semester PBL course to teach scientific integrity and professionalism. Both faculty and students endorsed the active learning approach for these topics, in contrast to a compliance-based approach that emphasises learning rules and regulations.

摘要

一个多学科教员委员会设计了一个课程,旨在将生物医学研究生培养成具有高度专业精神和社会责任感的研究人员,并为学生提供工具,以在复杂、快速发展的学术和社会环境中,以强烈的道德承诺进行导航。该课程使用基于问题的学习(PBL),因为它是积极的、以学习者为中心的,侧重于技能和过程的发展。开发了两门课程:《科学专业精神:科学诚信》针对特定学科和广泛的专业规范和义务,以及科学实践的伦理和负责任的研究行为。《科学专业精神:生物伦理学和社会责任》侧重于科学专业内当前的伦理和生物伦理问题,以及研究对社会的影响。每个小组会议都检查了案例情景,其中包括:(1)专业规范和义务的学习目标;(2)每个主题领域内的关键伦理问题和哲学;(3)一个或多个 RCR 教学领域;以及(4)至少一种道德反思。案例强调了科学实践的专业标准、义务和基本原则,利益相关者的竞争利益以及对科学的监督(内部和外部)。据我们所知,这是首次使用纵向、多学期 PBL 课程来教授科学诚信和专业精神。教员和学生都认可了这种针对这些主题的主动学习方法,而不是强调学习规则和法规的基于合规的方法。

相似文献

4
Scientific integrity and professionalism: do we need to expand the curriculum?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):911-2. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14598.
6
Teaching professionalism in undergraduate medical education.
JAMA. 1999 Sep 1;282(9):830-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.9.830.
7
Mediating the gap between the white coat ceremony and the ethics and professionalism curriculum.
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1168. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00036.
9
Teaching professionalism in science courses: anatomy to zoology.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Feb;28(2 Suppl):S8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.08.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Studying science in the context of ethics.
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S5-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00026.

引用本文的文献

1
Extending social accountability mandates to biomedical research in Canadian faculties of medicine.
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):56-61. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75425. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 28;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
3
Development of domain-specific epistemological beliefs of physiotherapists: a longitudinal study.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1844-z.
4
Changes in ethical attitudes of clinical laboratory professionals after teaching them ethics using three different methods.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Apr 29;33:36. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.36. eCollection 2019.
5
Good Scientific Practice: Developing a Curriculum for Medical Students in Germany.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):127-139. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0076-7. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
6
A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1719-1754. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9869-3. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):883-912. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
Navigating Bioethical Waters: Two Pilot Projects in Problem-Based Learning for Future Bioscience and Biotechnology Professionals.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1649-1667. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9725-2. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Toward a more professional and practical medical education: a novel Central European approach.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015 Jun 23;6:459-67. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S81016. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond responsible conduct in research: new pedagogies to address macroethics of nanobiotechnologies.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i1.10.
2
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
4
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
5
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
6
A code of ethics for the life sciences.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Mar;13(1):25-43. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0007-x.
8
Principles of biomedical ethics.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999 May;17(2):283-306, ix. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70060-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验