• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation.基于问题的学习在生物医学研究生专业精神和科学诚信培训中的应用:过程评估。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):620-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035238. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
2
Developing a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum for professionalism and scientific integrity training for biomedical graduate students.为生物医学研究生制定基于问题的学习(PBL)课程,以培养专业精神和科学诚信。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):614-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035220. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
3
Learning by doing: effectively incorporating ethics education into residency training.从做中学:将伦理教育有效地纳入住院医师培训。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Apr;28(4):578-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2277-0. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
Mediating the gap between the white coat ceremony and the ethics and professionalism curriculum.弥合白袍仪式与伦理和职业素养课程之间的差距。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1168. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00036.
5
Perceptions of Medical Students and Facilitators of an Early Clinical Exposure Instructional Program.医学生和早期临床接触教学计划促进者的看法。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 May;98 Suppl 4:S64-70.
6
Medical ethics educational improvement, is it needed or not?! Survey for the assessment of the needed form, methods and topics of medical ethics teaching course amongst the final years medical students Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University (ASU), Cairo, Egypt 2010.医学伦理学教育改进,是否有必要?!2010年于埃及开罗艾因夏姆斯大学医学院对医学专业最后一年学生进行的关于医学伦理学教学课程所需形式、方法和主题评估的调查。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 Jul;18(5):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods.医学教育环境中的伦理教学:对学习和评估方法多样性的偏好
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1328257. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1328257.
8
Professional Competencies ToolKit: Using Flash Cards to Teach Reflective Practice to Medical Students in Clinical Clerkship.专业能力工具包:使用抽认卡向临床实习医学生传授反思性实践
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Sep 15;14:10750. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10750.
9
"Thinking ethics": a novel, pilot, proof-of-concept program of integrating ethics into the Physiology curriculum in South India.“思考伦理学”:印度南部一项将伦理学融入生理学课程的新颖、试点性概念验证项目。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2017 Jun 1;41(2):306-311. doi: 10.1152/advan.00183.2016.
10
Curriculum evaluation of ethical reasoning and professional responsibility.伦理推理与职业责任的课程评估
J Dent Educ. 2003 Jan;67(1):55-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Students' Acquaintance with Core Concepts, Institutions and Guidelines on Good Scientific Practice: A Pre- and Post-questionnaire Survey.医学生对良好科学实践核心概念、机构和准则的了解:一项前后问卷调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1827-1845. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00215-3. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Good Scientific Practice: Developing a Curriculum for Medical Students in Germany.良好科研实践:为德国医学生制定课程。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):127-139. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0076-7. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.面对面与在线伦理教学的元分析比较:混合方法的案例。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1719-1754. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9869-3. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.教育伦理教学方法述评。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):883-912. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
5
Navigating Bioethical Waters: Two Pilot Projects in Problem-Based Learning for Future Bioscience and Biotechnology Professionals.探索生物伦理领域:面向未来生物科学与生物技术专业人员的两个基于问题的学习试点项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1649-1667. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9725-2. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness.一种针对科学家的伦理培训的意义建构方法:培训效果的初步证据。
Ethics Behav. 2008 Oct 1;18(4):315-339. doi: 10.1080/10508420802487815.
2
Fostering a culture of responsible lab conduct.培育一种实验室责任行为文化。
Science. 2008 Nov 21;322(5905):1186. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5905.1186b.
3
Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity.促进研究诚信的集体开放性及其他建议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec;13(4):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9047-0. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
4
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.在整个大学范围内扩大负责任的研究行为指导。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):876-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
5
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.应对科研行为责任教育中的挑战。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):870-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
6
The CITI program: an international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research.CITI项目:一个关于保护人类受试者及负责任的研究行为教育的国际在线资源。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):861-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7770.
7
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
8
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.已报告的关于负责任的研究课程行为的目标。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):846-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
9
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.科研行为规范教学的历史、目的及未来。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):829-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
10
Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study.科研行为规范课程的有效性:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y. Epub 2007 Jun 19.

基于问题的学习在生物医学研究生专业精神和科学诚信培训中的应用:过程评估。

Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: process evaluation.

机构信息

Division Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):620-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035238. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.035238
PMID:20663754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3752918/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.

METHOD

We used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.

RESULTS

Both facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.

CONCLUSIONS

These data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an 'ethics' course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项过程评估,(a)评估新的基于问题的学习课程在向生物医学研究生教授专业精神和科学诚信方面的有效性,以及(b)修改课程以增强其相关性和有效性。该课程呈现了科学实践中的实际案例和问题,以促进技能发展并使学生适应科学的专业规范。

方法

我们使用了 5 步李克特量表问题、开放式问题和对学生和教师的访谈来评估课程的有效性。

结果

教师和学生都认为课程目标已经实现。例如,受访者更喜欢主动学习而不是讲座;教师和学生都认为该课程增加了他们对规范、专业科学家的角色义务和责任的理解。他们还报告说,他们能够更准确地识别伦理情况,并且感到自己在道德推理和有效团队合作方面的技能有所提高。

结论

这些数据有助于改进课程实施和教学材料。例如,为了纠正将这门课程视为“伦理学”课程的负面看法,我们重新设计了案例讨论活动,以加强学习目标和重要技能。我们对案例进行了修改,使其更能吸引学生的兴趣,并且为每位教师提供了更具体的培训和案例资源。基于问题的学习小组策略可以激发一种环境,使参与者更加意识到科学的伦理含义,并增加他们对专业行为的社会化和公开交流。