Division Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, North Carolina, USA.
J Med Ethics. 2010 Oct;36(10):620-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035238. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
We conducted a process evaluation to (a) assess the effectiveness of a new problem-based learning curriculum designed to teach professionalism and scientific integrity to biomedical graduate students and (b) modify the course to enhance its relevance and effectiveness. The content presented realistic cases and issues in the practice of science, to promote skill development and to acculturate students to professional norms of science.
We used 5-step Likert-scaled questions, open-ended questions, and interviews of students and facilitators to assess curricular effectiveness.
Both facilitators and students perceived course objectives were achieved. For example, respondents preferred active learning over lectures; both faculty and students perceived that the curriculum increased their understanding of norms, role obligations and responsibilities of professional scientists. They also reported an increased ability to identify ethical situations and felt that they had developed skills in moral reasoning and effective group work.
These data helped to improve course implementation and instructional material. For example, to correct a negative perception that this was an 'ethics' course, we redesigned case debriefing activities to reinforce learning objectives and important skills. We refined cases to be more engaging and relevant for students, and gave facilitators more specific training and resources for each case. The problem-based learning small group strategy can stimulate an environment whereby participants are more aware of ethical implications of science, and increase their socialisation and open communication about professional behaviour.
我们进行了一项过程评估,(a)评估新的基于问题的学习课程在向生物医学研究生教授专业精神和科学诚信方面的有效性,以及(b)修改课程以增强其相关性和有效性。该课程呈现了科学实践中的实际案例和问题,以促进技能发展并使学生适应科学的专业规范。
我们使用了 5 步李克特量表问题、开放式问题和对学生和教师的访谈来评估课程的有效性。
教师和学生都认为课程目标已经实现。例如,受访者更喜欢主动学习而不是讲座;教师和学生都认为该课程增加了他们对规范、专业科学家的角色义务和责任的理解。他们还报告说,他们能够更准确地识别伦理情况,并且感到自己在道德推理和有效团队合作方面的技能有所提高。
这些数据有助于改进课程实施和教学材料。例如,为了纠正将这门课程视为“伦理学”课程的负面看法,我们重新设计了案例讨论活动,以加强学习目标和重要技能。我们对案例进行了修改,使其更能吸引学生的兴趣,并且为每位教师提供了更具体的培训和案例资源。基于问题的学习小组策略可以激发一种环境,使参与者更加意识到科学的伦理含义,并增加他们对专业行为的社会化和公开交流。