Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentrum für Nervenheilkunde der Universität Rostock, Rostock, Germany. ekkehardt.kumbier@ medizin.uni-rostock.de
Psychopathology. 2010;43(6):335-44. doi: 10.1159/000320348. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
Next to Karl Leonhard (1904-1988), Helmut Rennert (1920-1994) was the internationally best known representative of psychiatry from the former German Democratic Republic (GDR). He rose to prominence above all through his model of the universal genesis of endogenous psychoses, which constituted an antithesis to Leonhard's differentiated division. The 'polar opposite' aspects of Rennert and Leonhard are represented with an emphasis on their contrasting views of psychiatric nosology. In this respect, Rennert's model conceptions constitute the primary focus of attention. The fact that both concepts continue to possess topical perspectives to this day is reflected in the current discussion regarding nosological, categorical, syndromatological and dimensional approaches in relation to the further development of the classification systems of mental disorders. The preparatory work on the future classification systems will potentially omit the dichotomy between schizophrenic and affective disorders. These endeavors are in accordance with Rennert's unitarian psychopathological view and support his acceptance of the psychopathological continuity from affective to schizophrenic syndromes. The current discussion concerning the future classification is in line with Rennert, whose aim was to provide an unconventional model that unites findings from the different fields of psychiatric research. The classification of mental disorders without a previous establishment on the basis of fundamental theoretical assumptions could certainly foster a dynamic development in the future. A differentiated knowledge of the history of the ideas of unitary psychosis and their further development might be helpful in this development and can be of particular use when critically questioning explanatory approaches that are prone to simplification.
除了卡尔·莱昂哈德(1904-1988 年)之外,赫尔穆特·伦纳特(1920-1994 年)是前东德(东德)在国际上最知名的精神病学代表。他的普遍内源性精神病发生模型使他声名远扬,该模型构成了对莱昂哈德的差异化划分的对立面。伦纳特和莱昂哈德的“对立面”方面以强调他们对精神病学分类学的对比观点为代表。在这方面,伦纳特的模型概念构成了主要的关注焦点。这两个概念至今仍具有重要意义,这反映在当前关于分类学、分类、综合征学和维度方法的讨论中,这些讨论涉及精神障碍分类系统的进一步发展。未来分类系统的准备工作可能会省略精神分裂症和情感障碍之间的二分法。这些努力符合伦纳特的一元病理心理学观点,并支持他接受从情感到精神分裂症综合征的病理连续性。当前关于未来分类的讨论与伦纳特的观点一致,他的目标是提供一个非传统的模型,将精神病学研究的不同领域的发现结合起来。没有基于基本理论假设的精神障碍分类肯定会在未来促进动态发展。对一元精神病思想的历史及其进一步发展的深入了解可能有助于这种发展,并在批判性质疑易于简化的解释方法时特别有用。