• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价注意网络测试:注意网络测试的心理计量学和理论考虑。

Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):637-51. doi: 10.1037/a0019803.

DOI:10.1037/a0019803
PMID:20804252
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Attention Network Test (ANT) is a tool used to assess the efficiency of the 3 attention networks-alerting, orienting, and executive control. The ANT has become popular in the neuropsychological literature since its first description in 2002, with some form of the task currently appearing in no less than 65 original research papers. Although several general reviews of the ANT exist, none provide an analysis of its psychometric properties.

METHOD

Data from 15 unique studies were collected, resulting in a large sample (N = 1,129) of healthy individuals. Split-half reliability, variance structure, distribution shape, and independence of measurement of the 3 attention network scores were analyzed, considering both reaction time and accuracy as dependent variables.

RESULTS

Split-half reliabilities of reaction time based attention network scores were low for alerting (rweighted = .20, CI 95%weighted [.14, .27], Spearman-Brown r = .38) and orienting (rweighted = .32, CI 95%weighted [.26, .38], Spearman-Brown r = .55), and moderate high for executive control (rweighted = .65, CI 95%weighted [.61, .71], Spearman-Brown r = .81). Analysis of the variance structure of the ANT indicated that power to find significant effects was variable across networks and dependent on the statistical analysis being used. Both analysis of variance (significant interaction observed in 100% of 15 studies) and correlational analyses (multiple-significant inter-network correlations observed) suggest that the networks measured by the ANT are not independent.

CONCLUSIONS

In the collection, analysis and interpretation of any test data, psychometric properties, such as those reported here for the ANT, must be carefully considered.

摘要

目的

注意网络测试(ANT)是一种用于评估 3 种注意网络(警觉、定向和执行控制)效率的工具。自 2002 年首次描述以来,ANT 在神经心理学文献中变得很流行,目前该任务的某种形式至少出现在 65 篇原始研究论文中。尽管有几个关于 ANT 的一般综述,但没有一个分析其心理测量特性。

方法

收集了 15 项独特研究的数据,得到了一个大型样本(N=1129),其中包括健康个体。分析了 3 种注意网络分数的半分可靠性、方差结构、分布形状和测量的独立性,同时考虑了反应时间和准确性作为因变量。

结果

基于反应时间的警觉(rweighted=.20,95%置信区间加权[rweighted] [.14,.27],Spearman-Brown r=.38)和定向(rweighted=.32,95%置信区间加权[rweighted] [.26,.38],Spearman-Brown r=.55)的注意网络分数的半分可靠性较低,而执行控制(rweighted=.65,95%置信区间加权[rweighted] [.61,.71],Spearman-Brown r=.81)的半分可靠性中等较高。对 ANT 的方差结构分析表明,网络之间的效应显著程度的检测能力因网络而异,且取决于所使用的统计分析。方差分析(在 15 项研究中的 100%观察到显著的交互作用)和相关分析(观察到多个网络间的显著相关性)都表明,ANT 测量的网络不是独立的。

结论

在任何测试数据的收集、分析和解释中,必须仔细考虑心理测量特性,如这里报告的 ANT 的特性。

相似文献

1
Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test.评价注意网络测试:注意网络测试的心理计量学和理论考虑。
Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):637-51. doi: 10.1037/a0019803.
2
The effect of music-induced mood on attentional networks.音乐引起的情绪对注意网络的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Jun 1;46(3):214-22. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2010.541255.
3
Event-related potentials associated with Attention Network Test.与注意网络测试相关的事件相关电位。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 May;76(2):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
4
Alerting, orienting, and executive attention in children with ADHD.注意警觉、定向和执行功能在 ADHD 儿童中的表现。
J Atten Disord. 2011 May;15(4):310-20. doi: 10.1177/1087054710366384. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
5
Development of attentional networks in childhood.儿童期注意力网络的发展。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1029-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012.
6
Measuring vigilance while assessing the functioning of the three attentional networks: the ANTI-Vigilance task.测量警觉性的同时评估三个注意网络的功能:ANTI-Vigilance 任务。
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jun 15;198(2):312-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
7
Associations between regional cortical thickness and attentional networks as measured by the attention network test.注意力网络测试评估的区域皮质厚度与注意力网络之间的关联。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Feb;21(2):345-56. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq101. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
8
Attentional networks efficiency in preterm children.早产儿注意网络效率。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jan;16(1):130-7. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709991032. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
9
The activation of attentional networks.注意网络的激活。
Neuroimage. 2005 Jun;26(2):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
10
Hemispheric asymmetry in the efficiency of attentional networks.注意网络效率的半球不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Jul;79(2):117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
HD-tDCS improves conflict processing and general behavioral stability.高密度经颅直流电刺激可改善冲突处理能力和总体行为稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 17;15(1):30151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15337-6.
2
A Transdiagnostic fMRI Dataset With 300+ Deeply Phenotyped Subjects Across Resting and Task States.一个跨静息态和任务态、包含300多名深度表型化受试者的跨诊断功能磁共振成像数据集。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 16:2025.07.15.25331595. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.25331595.
3
Moving beyond button presses to enhance the reliability of congruency tasks.超越按键操作以提高一致性任务的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 2;57(8):215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02740-0.
4
Readiness for Perception and Action: Towards a More Mechanistic Understanding of Phasic Alertness.感知与行动的准备状态:迈向对阶段性警觉更具机制性的理解
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):19. doi: 10.5334/joc.426. eCollection 2025.
5
Effects of acute rope skipping exercises of different exercise modes on cognitive function in 9-10-year-old children.不同运动模式的急性跳绳运动对 9-10 岁儿童认知功能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 25;14(1):29172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80987-x.
6
A measure of reliability convergence to select and optimize cognitive tasks for individual differences research.一种用于个体差异研究中选择和优化认知任务的可靠性收敛性度量。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jul 4;2(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00114-4.
7
The effect of considering eye movement time in evaluating the efficiency of attentional networks.考虑眼动时间对评估注意网络效率的影响。
Psych J. 2024 Aug;13(4):588-597. doi: 10.1002/pchj.734. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Implementation of an online spacing flanker task and evaluation of its test-retest reliability using measures of inhibitory control and the distribution of spatial attention.采用抑制控制和空间注意分布的测量方法,实现在线空间线索任务的实施及其测试-重测信度的评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5947-5958. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02327-7. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
9
Cognitive Archeology and the Attentional System: An Evolutionary Mismatch for the Genus .认知考古学与注意力系统:一个属的进化不匹配
J Intell. 2023 Sep 12;11(9):183. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11090183.
10
The ANTI-Vea-UGR Platform: A Free Online Resource to Measure Attentional Networks (Alertness, Orienting, and Executive Control) Functioning and Executive/Arousal Vigilance.ANTI-Vea-UGR平台:一个用于测量注意力网络(警觉性、定向和执行控制)功能以及执行/唤醒警觉性的免费在线资源。
J Intell. 2023 Sep 8;11(9):181. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11090181.