Department of Dermatology, No. 1 Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2011 Mar;36(2):178-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03916.x. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Exposure of human skin to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) results in erythema, pigment darkening, skin cancer and photoageing. In addition to conventional organochemical and the physical-mineral type sunscreens (SS), other non-SS protective strategies have been investigated, including antioxidants (AOx) and topical DNA repair enzymes.
To investigate whether AOx could improve the protection provided by a broad-spectrum sunscreen (SS) preparation.
Volunteers were exposed to repetitive solar-simulated (ss)UVR at 1.5 times minimal erythema dose for four consecutive days. Thirty minutes before each exposure and 6, 24 and 48 h after the last exposure, the test materials [vehicle, SS (sun protection factor 25) alone, AOx alone and SS plus AOx] were applied to four different sites. Another two sites received ssUVR only, or SS plus AOx only, and a third site was left untreated (neither ssUVR or product). Erythema and pigmentation were measured using a Mexameter. Biopsy specimens were taken 72 h after the last irradiation. The thickness of the stratum corneum and epidermis were measured by microscopy. Expression of cytokeratins (CKs), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and CD1a-positive Langerhans cells (LCs) analysed by immunohistochemical staining, and relative expression levels were compared between all seven sites.
AOx alone did not reduce erythema. There was a significant reduction in pigmentation, and the product almost completely protected against LC depletion. AOx plus SS gave better protection against pigment formation and CK5/6 induction than SS alone. AOx alone protected against ssUVR-induced hyperproliferation, as shown by epidermal thickness and CK16 biomarkers, and was better than SS alone. Interestingly, although protection against induction of MMP-9, a marker of photoageing, did not reach significance when either SS or AOx were applied separately, there was complete protection against MMP-9 induction when these were combined.
Non-SS materials such as AOx can contribute significantly to sun protection when added to a broad-spectrum SS and applied topically to human skin in vivo.
人类皮肤暴露于紫外线辐射(UVR)会导致红斑、色素沉着、皮肤癌和光老化。除了传统的有机化学和物理矿物型防晒霜(SS)外,还研究了其他非 SS 保护策略,包括抗氧化剂(AOx)和局部 DNA 修复酶。
研究抗氧化剂(AOx)是否可以改善广谱防晒霜(SS)制剂的保护作用。
志愿者连续四天接受重复的太阳模拟(ss)UVR,剂量为最小红斑剂量的 1.5 倍。在每次暴露前 30 分钟以及最后一次暴露后 6、24 和 48 小时,将测试材料[载体、单独的 SS(防晒系数 25)、单独的 AOx 和 SS 加 AOx]涂抹在四个不同部位。另外两个部位仅接受 ssUVR 或 SS 加 AOx,第三个部位不接受治疗(既不接受 ssUVR 也不接受产品)。使用 Mexameter 测量红斑和色素沉着。在最后一次照射后 72 小时采集活检标本。通过显微镜测量角质层和表皮的厚度。通过免疫组织化学染色分析细胞角蛋白(CKs)、基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)和 CD1a 阳性朗格汉斯细胞(LCs)的表达,并比较所有七个部位之间的相对表达水平。
单独使用 AOx 并不能减轻红斑。色素沉着有明显减少,该产品几乎完全防止 LC 耗竭。与单独使用 SS 相比,AOx 加 SS 能更好地防止色素形成和 CK5/6 诱导。单独使用 AOx 可防止 ssUVR 诱导的过度增殖,这可通过表皮厚度和 CK16 生物标志物显示,并且优于单独使用 SS。有趣的是,尽管 SS 或 AOx 单独使用时对 MMP-9(光老化标志物)的诱导没有显著的保护作用,但当两者结合使用时,对 MMP-9 诱导的完全保护作用。
当非 SS 材料(如 AOx)添加到广谱 SS 中并在体内局部涂抹于人体皮肤时,可显著提高防晒效果。