Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 7;16(33):4180-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4180.
To evaluate a new hemostatic method using hemostatic forceps to prevent perforation and perioperative hemorrhage during colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
We studied 250 cases, in which ESD for colorectal tumors was performed at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine or Nara City Hospital between 2005 and 2010. We developed a new hemostatic method using hemostatic forceps in December 2008 for the efficient treatment of submucosal thick vessels. ESD was performed on 126 cases after adoption of the new method (the adopted group) and the new method was performed on 102 of these cases. ESD was performed on 124 cases before the adoption of the new method (the unadopted group). The details of the new method are as follows: firstly, a vessel was coagulated using the hemostatic forceps in the soft coagulation mode according to the standard procedure, and the coagulated vessel was removed using the forceps in the "endocut" mode without perioperative hemorrhage. Secondly, the partial surrounding submucosa was dissected using the forceps in the endocut mode. In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of this method.
Coagulated vessels were successfully removed using the hemostatic forceps in all 102 cases without severe perioperative hemorrhage. Moderate perioperative hemorrhage occurred in five cases (4.9%); however, it was stopped by immediately reuse of the hemostatic forceps. The partial surrounding submucosa was dissected using the forceps in all 102 cases. In the adopted group, the median operation time was 105 min. The proportion of endoscopic en bloc resection was 92.8% (P < 0.01) compared to 80.6% in the unadopted group. The postoperative hemorrhage and perforation rates were 2.3% and 2.3%. The rate of perforation was significantly lower than that in the unadopted group (9.6%, P < 0.01). We evaluated the ease of use of this method by allowing our three trainees to performed ESD on 46 cases, which were accomplished without any severe hemorrhage.
The new method effectively treated submucosal thick vessels and shows promise for the prevention of perforation and perioperative hemorrhage in colonic ESD.
评估一种使用止血钳预防结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)穿孔和围手术期出血的新止血方法。
我们研究了 2005 年至 2010 年期间在京都府立医科大学或奈良市医院进行的大肠肿瘤 ESD 的 250 例病例。我们于 2008 年 12 月开发了一种新的止血方法,使用止血钳有效治疗黏膜下厚血管。在采用新方法后对 126 例进行了 ESD(采用组),并对其中 102 例采用了新方法。在采用新方法之前对 124 例进行了 ESD(未采用组)。新方法的详细信息如下:首先,根据标准程序使用止血钳在软凝固模式下对血管进行凝固,然后使用“endo-cut”模式下的止血钳去除凝固的血管,无围手术期出血。其次,使用 endocut 模式下的止血钳部分切除周围黏膜下层。在本研究中,我们评估了该方法的疗效。
在所有 102 例中,使用止血钳成功去除了凝固的血管,无严重围手术期出血。五例(4.9%)发生中度围手术期出血;然而,通过立即重新使用止血钳止血。在所有 102 例中,使用止血钳对周围黏膜下层进行了部分切除。在采用组中,中位手术时间为 105 分钟。内镜整块切除率为 92.8%(P <0.01),高于未采用组的 80.6%。术后出血和穿孔率分别为 2.3%和 2.3%。穿孔率明显低于未采用组(9.6%,P <0.01)。我们让我们的三位学员在 46 例患者中进行 ESD,评估了该方法的易用性,手术均未发生严重出血。
新方法有效治疗了黏膜下厚血管,有望预防结肠 ESD 穿孔和围手术期出血。