Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Nov;48(11):1113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
Cognitive theories of depression emphasize negatively biased interpretations as an important target of therapy. Much of the research on interpretation bias in depression has focused on selection, or deciding which of several interpretations is likely. However, depressive biases may also exist in the generation of possible interpretations, or the ability to think of positive alternatives. If biases exist for generation as well as selection, therapeutic techniques to encourage the generation of more positive interpretations would be warranted. Asking therapy clients to consider someone else in a similar situation is a commonly used therapy strategy but has not been sufficiently examined empirically. In the current studies, we examine interpretation generation and selection in dysphoric and nondysphoric individuals, and contrast interpretations made for the self to interpretations made for two types of "other." Our studies reveal depressive biases in both interpretation generation and selection, and indicate that interpretation valence is highly sensitive to the type of other considered. All participants generated and selected significantly more positive interpretations for friends than for themselves, but generated significantly more negative interpretations for hypothetical others than for themselves. Our results suggest that encouraging dysphoric individuals to imagine others can be beneficial, but the type of "other" used is critically important, with instructions to consider a close friend most likely to be effective in decreasing negativity in interpretation.
抑郁的认知理论强调负面偏见解释是治疗的一个重要目标。许多关于抑郁解释偏差的研究都集中在选择上,即选择几种解释中哪种更有可能。然而,在产生可能的解释,即思考积极替代方案的能力方面,也可能存在抑郁偏见。如果在生成和选择中都存在偏见,那么鼓励生成更积极解释的治疗技术是合理的。让治疗客户考虑类似情况下的其他人是一种常用的治疗策略,但尚未得到充分的实证检验。在当前的研究中,我们考察了抑郁和非抑郁个体的解释生成和选择,并对比了为自己生成的解释和为两种“他人”生成的解释。我们的研究揭示了在解释生成和选择中存在抑郁偏见,并且表明解释的效价对所考虑的他人类型高度敏感。所有参与者为朋友生成和选择的积极解释明显多于为自己生成的解释,但为假设的他人生成的消极解释明显多于为自己生成的解释。我们的结果表明,鼓励抑郁个体想象他人可能是有益的,但使用的“他人”类型至关重要,指令考虑亲密朋友最有可能减少解释中的消极性。