Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neurology. 2010 Oct 12;75(15):1318-25. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f735bd. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) abnormalities detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) are useful markers for axonal loss and visual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their role in routine clinical management is not well-studied.
Clinical and OCT examinations were performed on 240 patients attending a neurology clinic. Using OCT 5th percentile to define abnormal RNFL thickness, we compared eyes classified by neurologists as having optic atrophy to RNFL thickness, and afferent pupillary defect (APD) to RNFL thickness ratios of eye pairs.
Mean RNFL thickness was less in eyes classified by neurologists as having optic atrophy (79.4 ± 21 μm; n=63) vs those without (97.0 ± 15 μm; n=417; p < 0.001, t test) and in eyes with an APD (84.1 ± 16 μm; n=44) than without an APD (95.8 ± 17 μm; n=436; p < 0.001). Physicians' diagnostic accuracy for detecting pallor in eyes with an abnormal RNFL thickness was 79% (sensitivity=0.56; specificity=0.82). Accuracy for detecting a RAPD in patients with mean RNFL ratio (affected eye to unaffected eye) <0.90 was 73% (sensitivity=0.30; specificity=0.86). Ability to detect visual pathway injury via assessment of atrophy and APD differed between neurologists.
OCT reveals RNFL abnormality in many patients in whom eyes are not classified by neurologic examiners as having optic atrophy. Further study is needed to define the role of OCT measures in the context of examinations for optic atrophy and APD by neuroophthalmologists. OCT-measured RNFL thickness is likely to have an important future role in the clinical setting.
光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检测到的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)异常是多发性硬化症(MS)轴突丢失和视觉功能障碍的有用标志物,但它们在常规临床管理中的作用尚未得到充分研究。
对 240 名在神经科诊所就诊的患者进行了临床和 OCT 检查。使用 OCT 的第 5 百分位来定义异常的 RNFL 厚度,我们比较了神经科医生诊断为视神经萎缩的眼睛与 RNFL 厚度的关系,以及与相对应眼睛的传入瞳孔缺损(APD)与 RNFL 厚度的比值。
神经科医生诊断为视神经萎缩的眼睛(79.4±21μm;n=63)的平均 RNFL 厚度明显低于未诊断为视神经萎缩的眼睛(97.0±15μm;n=417;p<0.001,t 检验),也低于存在 APD 的眼睛(84.1±16μm;n=44),高于不存在 APD 的眼睛(95.8±17μm;n=436;p<0.001)。医生检测具有异常 RNFL 厚度的眼睛苍白的诊断准确性为 79%(敏感性=0.56;特异性=0.82)。对于平均 RNFL 比值(患病眼与未患病眼)<0.90 的患者,检测到 RAPD 的准确率为 73%(敏感性=0.30;特异性=0.86)。神经科医生对评估萎缩和 APD 来检测视觉通路损伤的能力存在差异。
OCT 揭示了许多患者的 RNFL 异常,而这些患者并未被神经科医生诊断为视神经萎缩。需要进一步研究以确定 OCT 测量在神经眼科医生进行视神经萎缩和 APD 检查时的作用。OCT 测量的 RNFL 厚度在临床环境中可能具有重要的未来作用。