Aleman Tomas S, Huang Jiayan, Garrity Sean T, Carter Stuart B, Aleman Wendy D, Ying Gui-Shuang, Tamhankar Madhura A
Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA ; Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 3;3(6):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.3.6.4. eCollection 2014 Oct.
To study the relationship between the appearance of the optic nerve and the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness determined by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Records from patients with spectral domain-OCT imaging in a neuro-ophthalmology practice were reviewed. Eyes with glaucoma/glaucoma suspicion, macular/optic nerve edema, pseudophakia, and with refractive errors > 6D were excluded. Optic nerve appearance by slit lamp biomicroscopy was related to the RNFL thickness by spectral domain-OCT and to visual field results.
Ninety-one patients (176 eyes; mean age: 49 ± 15 years) were included. Eighty-three eyes (47%) showed optic nerve pallor; 89 eyes (50.6%) showed RNFL thinning (sectoral or average peripapillary). Average peripapillary RNFL thickness in eyes with pallor (mean ± SD = 76 ± 17 μm) was thinner compared to eyes without pallor (91 ± 14 μm, < 0.001). Optic nerve pallor predicted RNFL thinning with a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 75%. Optic nerve appearance predicted RNFL thinning (with a sensitivity and specificity of 81%) when RNFL had thinned by ∼ 40%. Most patients with pallor had RNFL thinning with (66%) or without (25%) visual field loss; the remainder had normal RNFL and fields (5%) or with visual field abnormalities (4%).
Optic nerve pallor as a predictor of RNFL thinning showed fair sensitivity and specificity, although it is optimally sensitive/specific only when substantial RNFL loss has occurred.
Finding an acceptable relationship between the optic nerve appearance by ophthalmoscopy and spectral domain-OCT RNFL measures will help the clinician's interpretation of the information provided by this technology, which is gaining momentum in neuro-ophthalmic research.
研究视神经外观与通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测定的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度之间的关系。
回顾了神经眼科诊所中进行光谱域-OCT成像的患者记录。排除患有青光眼/疑似青光眼、黄斑/视神经水肿、人工晶状体眼以及屈光不正>6D的眼睛。通过裂隙灯生物显微镜检查的视神经外观与光谱域-OCT测量的RNFL厚度以及视野结果相关。
纳入91例患者(176只眼;平均年龄:49±15岁)。83只眼(47%)表现为视神经苍白;89只眼(50.6%)表现为RNFL变薄(扇形或视乳头周围平均变薄)。视神经苍白的眼睛视乳头周围平均RNFL厚度(平均值±标准差=76±17μm)比无苍白的眼睛(91±14μm,P<0.001)更薄。视神经苍白预测RNFL变薄的敏感性为69%,特异性为75%。当RNFL变薄约40%时,视神经外观预测RNFL变薄(敏感性和特异性为81%)。大多数视神经苍白的患者伴有(66%)或不伴有(25%)视野缺损;其余患者RNFL和视野正常(5%)或伴有视野异常(4%)。
视神经苍白作为RNFL变薄的预测指标,其敏感性和特异性尚可,尽管只有在发生大量RNFL丢失时才具有最佳的敏感性/特异性。
在检眼镜检查的视神经外观与光谱域-OCT的RNFL测量值之间找到可接受的关系,将有助于临床医生解释这项在神经眼科研究中日益重要的技术所提供的信息。