Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiologic Sciences, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA.
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):3054-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0779-7.
The use of real-time two-dimensional B-mode ultrasound (RTUS)-aided central venous access device (CVAD) insertion has been recommended by health-care agencies, but a realistic failure rate for bedside attempts is unknown.
The failure rate of RTUS-aided CVAD insertion is estimated using data from adult inpatients and outpatients referred to a tertiary referral radiology department for a new CVAD insertion during the 2.5-year period ending February 29, 2008. Cannulation failure, complications, and additional fluoroscopic interventions per central vein cannulation attempt and per patient encounter were retrospectively collected and evaluated.
Of the 2456 consecutive patient encounters, the index central vein cannulation failure rate using only RTUS and fluoroscopy was 4.8%; ultimate failure rate was 0.3%. The procedural mortality rate was 0.04%. If the index upper-body central vein cannulation failed, an ipsilateral upper-body attempt through a different central vein failed in 63.6%, whereas a contralateral upper-body attempt failed in 26.7% (p = 0.11) and a common femoral vein attempt failed in 11.5% (p = 0.0039).
The minimum bedside failure rate of RTUS-aided CVAD insertion is 4.8% for the index central vein cannulated. The ultimate failure rate of 0.3% and the mortality rate of 0.04% are due to RTUS, fluoroscopy, and the additional equipment available in an IR suite. If the upper-body index central vein cannulation fails, cannulation of the common femoral vein is more likely to succeed than additional attempts in other ipsilateral upper-body central veins.
医疗机构推荐使用实时二维 B 型超声(RTUS)辅助中心静脉置管(CVAD)插入,但床边尝试的实际失败率尚不清楚。
使用 2008 年 2 月 29 日结束的 2.5 年期间,向三级转诊放射科部门转介进行新 CVAD 插入的成年住院和门诊患者的数据,估计 RTUS 辅助 CVAD 插入的失败率。回顾性收集和评估每中央静脉插管尝试和每位患者的插管失败、并发症和额外的透视干预。
在 2456 例连续患者就诊中,仅使用 RTUS 和透视的指数中心静脉插管失败率为 4.8%;最终失败率为 0.3%。程序死亡率为 0.04%。如果指数上半身中心静脉插管失败,同侧上半身通过不同的中心静脉插管尝试失败率为 63.6%,而对侧上半身插管尝试失败率为 26.7%(p=0.11),股总静脉插管尝试失败率为 11.5%(p=0.0039)。
床边 RTUS 辅助 CVAD 插入的最低失败率为索引中央静脉插管的 4.8%。0.3%的最终失败率和 0.04%的死亡率是由于 RTUS、透视和 IR 套房中可用的附加设备所致。如果上半身指数中心静脉插管失败,股总静脉插管比其他同侧上半身中央静脉的额外尝试更有可能成功。