Division of Cardiology, Al-Sabah Arrhythmia Institute, St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01886.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone has been thought to be insufficient in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). We hypothesized that preablation treatment of PersAF with a potent antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) would facilitate reverse atrial remodeling and result in high procedural efficacy after PVI alone.
Seventy-one consecutive patients (59.4 ± 9.8 years) with PersAF and prior AAD failure were treated with oral dofetilide (768 ± 291 mcg/day) for a median of 85 days pre-PVI. P-wave duration (Pdur) on ECG was used to assess reverse atrial remodeling. Thirty-five patients with paroxysmal (P) AF not treated with an AAD served as controls. All patients underwent PVI alone; dofetilide was discontinued 1-3 mos postablation. In the PersAF patients, the Pdur decreased from 136.3 ± 21.7 ms (assessed postcardioversion on dofetilide) to 118.6 ± 20.4 ms (assessed immediately prior to PVI) (P < 0.001). In contrast, no change in Pdur (122.6 ± 11.5 ms vs. 121.3 ± 13.7 ms, P = NS) was observed in PAF patients. The 6 and 12 mos AAD-free response to ablation was 76% and 70%, respectively, in PersAF patients, similar to the 80% and 75%, response in PAF patients (P = NS). A decline in Pdur in response to dofetilide was the only predictor of long-term clinical response to PVI in patients with PersAF.
Pre-treatment with AAD resulted in a decrease in Pdur suggesting reverse atrial electrical remodeling in PersAF patients. This may explain the excellent clinical outcomes using PVI alone, and may suggest an alternative ablation strategy for PersAF.
孤立的肺静脉隔离(PVI)已被认为在持续性心房颤动(PersAF)患者中不够充分。我们假设在 PVI 之前用有效的抗心律失常药物(AAD)预处理 PersAF 将促进逆心房重构,并在单独进行 PVI 后获得高程序疗效。
71 例连续的 PersAF 患者(59.4 ± 9.8 岁)和之前 AAD 治疗失败的患者接受口服多非利特(768 ± 291 mcg/天)治疗,中位数为 85 天。心电图上的 P 波持续时间(Pdur)用于评估逆心房重构。35 例未接受 AAD 治疗的阵发性(P)AF 患者作为对照组。所有患者均单独进行 PVI;多非利特在消融后 1-3 个月停药。在 PersAF 患者中,Pdur 从 136.3 ± 21.7 ms(多非利特复律后评估)降至 118.6 ± 20.4 ms(PVI 前即刻评估)(P < 0.001)。相比之下,在 PAF 患者中未观察到 Pdur 的变化(122.6 ± 11.5 ms 与 121.3 ± 13.7 ms,P = NS)。在 PersAF 患者中,消融后 6 个月和 12 个月的 AAD 无反应率分别为 76%和 70%,与 PAF 患者的 80%和 75%的反应率相似(P = NS)。多非利特治疗后 Pdur 的下降是 PersAF 患者对 PVI 长期临床反应的唯一预测因素。
AAD 预处理导致 PersAF 患者 Pdur 下降,提示逆心房电重构。这可能解释了单独使用 PVI 的优异临床结果,并可能为 PersAF 提供替代消融策略。