• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七氟醚与丙泊酚在瑞芬太尼复合麻醉诱导用于纤维支气管镜引导气管插管中的比较

[Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in combined anesthesia induction with remifentanil for tracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope].

作者信息

Tan Hong-ying, Cao Long-hui, Huang Wan, Zhong Zhong-jiang, Lin Wen-qian, Zeng Wei-an

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center/State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Aug;30(8):1857-9.

PMID:20813685
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect and hemodynamics of sevoflurane(SEV) and propofol (PRO) in combined anesthesia induction with remifentanil for tracheal intubation fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients without difficult airway undergoing elective surgery with tracheal intubation general anesthesia were randomly divided into SEV and PRO group. FOB intubation was performed with sevoflurane or propofol administration combined with remifentanil induction. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), SPO2 and Narcotrend index (NI) were monitored to evaluate the anesthetic depth during the induction. The time to loss of consciousness (LOC), intubation time, intubation score, anesthetic dosage and adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the two groups in the time to LOC, intubation time, intubation score, remifentanil dosage. Intubation was performed successfully in both groups. BP and HR of both groups decreased after the induction and did not increase after the intubation, with variation within the normal range. No significant difference in BP and HR was found between the two groups. NI of both groups decreased after the induction and during intubation. NI of SEV group 2 min after intubation was higher than that of PRO group. There was no significant difference in NI between the two groups at the other time points. No significant adverse effects or recall of the intubation procedure were reported.

CONCLUSION

Anesthesia induction FOB intubation with sevoflurane and propofol, both in combination with remifentanil, can be applied in surgical patients without contraindications to general anesthesia, and both methods can provide fast induction and good intubation condition with stable hemodynamics.

摘要

目的

比较七氟醚(SEV)与丙泊酚(PRO)在与瑞芬太尼联合用于纤维支气管镜引导气管插管全身麻醉诱导中的效果及血流动力学变化。

方法

将24例拟行择期手术、无困难气道且需气管插管全身麻醉的患者随机分为SEV组和PRO组。采用七氟醚或丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼诱导进行纤维支气管镜引导下气管插管。监测诱导过程中的血压(BP)、心率(HR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SPO2)及脑电双频指数(NI)以评估麻醉深度。记录意识消失时间(LOC)、插管时间、插管评分、麻醉用药量及不良反应。

结果

两组在LOC时间、插管时间、插管评分、瑞芬太尼用量方面差异无统计学意义。两组均成功完成插管。诱导后两组BP、HR均下降,插管后未上升,波动在正常范围内。两组BP、HR差异无统计学意义。两组诱导后及插管过程中NI均下降。插管后2分钟SEV组NI高于PRO组。其他时间点两组NI差异无统计学意义。未报道明显不良反应及对插管过程存在回忆。

结论

七氟醚和丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼用于纤维支气管镜引导气管插管全身麻醉诱导,可应用于无全身麻醉禁忌证的手术患者,两种方法均可实现快速诱导,提供良好的插管条件,且血流动力学稳定。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in combined anesthesia induction with remifentanil for tracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope].七氟醚与丙泊酚在瑞芬太尼复合麻醉诱导用于纤维支气管镜引导气管插管中的比较
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Aug;30(8):1857-9.
2
Induction with sevoflurane-remifentanil is comparable to propofol-fentanyl-rocuronium in PONV after laparoscopic surgery.七氟醚-瑞芬太尼诱导用于腹腔镜手术后恶心呕吐的发生率与丙泊酚-芬太尼-罗库溴铵相当。
Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):660-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018422.
3
Intraocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevoflurane: both combined with remifentanil.与七氟醚相比,丙泊酚麻醉期间眼压降低更明显:两者均联合瑞芬太尼使用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Jul;46(6):703-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460612.x.
4
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery.全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼麻醉用于门诊耳鼻喉科手术的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):324-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00367-7.
5
[Tracheal intubation quality under remifentanil-propofol with sevoflurane compared with remifentanil-propofol with rocuronium: a randomized double-blind clinical trial].瑞芬太尼 - 丙泊酚复合七氟醚与瑞芬太尼 - 丙泊酚复合罗库溴铵用于气管插管的质量比较:一项随机双盲临床试验
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Jun-Jul;57(6):351-6. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70247-4.
6
[TIVA with propofol-remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl in laparoscopic operations. Hemodynamics, awakening and adverse effects].[腹腔镜手术中丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼平衡麻醉。血流动力学、苏醒及不良反应]
Anaesthesist. 1999 Nov;48(11):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s001010050789.
7
The neuromuscular effects of rocuronium under sevoflurane-remifentanil or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized clinical comparative study in an Asian population.七氟醚-瑞芬太尼或丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉下罗库溴铵的神经肌肉效应:一项针对亚洲人群的随机临床对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0231-0.
8
Hemodynamic differences between propofol-remifentanil and sevoflurane anesthesia for repair of cleft lip and palate in infants.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼与七氟醚麻醉用于婴儿唇腭裂修复术的血流动力学差异
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Jan;17(1):32-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01999.x.
9
[Blocking effect of remifentanil on sympathetic response to tracheal intubation during sevoflurane anesthesia].[瑞芬太尼对七氟醚麻醉期间气管插管交感反应的阻滞作用]
Masui. 2009 Jun;58(6):713-8.
10
Tracheal intubation conditions and cardiovascular effects after modified rapid-sequence induction with sevoflurane-rapacuronium versus propofol-rapacuronium.七氟醚-罗库溴铵与丙泊酚-罗库溴铵改良快速顺序诱导后气管插管条件及心血管效应比较
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Mar;14(2):115-20. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00365-8.

引用本文的文献

1
[Respiratory complications of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children aged 1 month to 3 years: a randomized trial].[丙泊酚、七氟醚和右美托咪定用于1至3岁儿童纤维支气管镜检查麻醉的呼吸并发症:一项随机试验]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2024 Sep 20;44(9):1631-1636. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.09.01.
2
A study of stress response to endotracheal intubation comparing glidescope and flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope.比较可视喉镜与纤维支气管镜引导经气管插管时应激反应的研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;30(5):1001-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.305.4788.