Suppr超能文献

定量实时 PCR 检测与临床和革兰氏染色鉴定细菌性阴道病的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis.

机构信息

Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Nord Marseille, Chemin des Bourrely, 13915 Marseille, France.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;29(12):1547-52. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-1039-3. Epub 2010 Sep 3.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis versus the standard methods, the Amsel criteria and the Nugent score. The Amsel criteria, the Nugent score, and results from the molecular tool were obtained independently from vaginal samples of 163 pregnant women who reported abnormal vaginal symptoms before 20 weeks gestation. To determine the performance of the molecular tool, we calculated the kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Either or both of the Amsel criteria (≥3 criteria) and the Nugent score (score ≥7) indicated that 25 women (15%) had bacterial vaginosis, and the remaining 138 women did not. DNA levels of Gardnerella vaginalis or Atopobium vaginae exceeded 10(9) copies/mL or 10(8) copies/mL, respectively, in 34 (21%) of the 163 samples. Complete agreement between both reference methods and high concentrations of G. vaginalis and A. vaginae was found in 94.5% of women (154/163 samples, kappa value = 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.81). The nine samples with discordant results were categorized as intermediate flora by the Nugent score. The molecular tool predicted bacterial vaginosis with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 73%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. The quantitative real-time PCR assay shows excellent agreement with the results of both reference methods for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

摘要

本研究旨在确定定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法在诊断细菌性阴道病方面的诊断准确性,将其与标准方法、Amsel 标准和 Nugent 评分进行比较。Amsel 标准、Nugent 评分和分子工具的结果均来自于 163 名在 20 周妊娠前报告阴道异常症状的孕妇的阴道样本。为了确定分子工具的性能,我们计算了 Kappa 值、敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。Amsel 标准(≥3 项标准)和 Nugent 评分(评分≥7)中的一项或两项均表明 25 名女性(15%)患有细菌性阴道病,其余 138 名女性未患有细菌性阴道病。163 个样本中,分别有 34 个(21%)样本中阴道加德纳菌或专性厌氧菌的 DNA 水平超过 10(9)拷贝/ml 或 10(8)拷贝/ml。两种参考方法与高浓度阴道加德纳菌和专性厌氧菌之间完全一致,在 94.5%的女性(154/163 个样本,Kappa 值=0.81,95%置信区间为 0.70-0.81)中发现。9 个结果不一致的样本根据 Nugent 评分被归类为中间菌群。该分子工具预测细菌性阴道病的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 93%,阳性预测值为 73%,阴性预测值为 100%。定量实时 PCR 检测法与两种参考方法在细菌性阴道病的诊断上具有极好的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验