Suppr超能文献

在近视患者的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后眼中,使用眼前节分析系统(Pentacam)和超声角膜测厚法测量中央角膜厚度的比较。

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes for myopia.

作者信息

Al-Mezaine Hani S, Al-Amro Saleh A, Kangave Dustan, Al-Obeidan Saleh, Al-Jubair Khaled M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Oct;20(5):852-7. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000507.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with those obtained using DGH ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes for myopia.

METHODS

In a prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 143 eyes of 72 post-LASIK patients using both the Pentacam and UP at the Eye Consultants Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

The mean CCT was 522 +/- 42.2 microm with the Oculus Pentacam and 516.2 +/- 40.6 microm with UP. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean +/- SD for the differences between the 2 devices was 5.8 +/- 13.6 microm, with 95% confidence interval limits ranging from -20.9 microm to 32.6 microm. A test of statistical significance indicated that the mean differences of 5.8 +/- 13.6 microm differed significantly from zero (p<0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test), thus indicating that the Pentacam measurements tended to overestimate CCT compared with UP. Analysis of regression showed a high correlation between the values obtained with both devices (r=0.947, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In post-LASIK myopic eyes, although a high correlation has been shown between Pentacam and UP measurements, Pentacam tends to overestimate CCT compared to UP. Pentacam probably cannot be used interchangeably with UP in post-LASIK eyes for myopia.

摘要

目的

比较在近视患者的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)术后眼中,使用Pentacam Scheimpflug系统获得的中央角膜厚度(CCT)测量值与使用DGH超声角膜测厚仪(UP)获得的测量值。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,沙特阿拉伯利雅得眼科咨询中心对72例LASIK术后患者的143只眼睛同时使用Pentacam和UP进行测量一致性评估。

结果

使用Oculus Pentacam测得的平均CCT为522±42.2微米,使用UP测得的平均CCT为516.2±40.6微米。Bland-Altman图显示,两种设备测量值差异的均值±标准差为5.8±13.6微米,95%置信区间范围为-20.9微米至32.6微米。统计学显著性检验表明,5.8±13.6微米的平均差异显著不同于零(p<0.001;Wilcoxon符号秩检验),这表明与UP相比,Pentacam测量值倾向于高估CCT。回归分析显示,两种设备获得的值之间具有高度相关性(r=0.947,p<0.001)。

结论

在LASIK术后近视眼中,尽管Pentacam和UP测量值之间显示出高度相关性,但与UP相比,Pentacam倾向于高估CCT。在LASIK术后近视眼中,Pentacam可能不能与UP互换使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验