Sleep and Chronobiology Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA.
J Sleep Res. 2011 Jun;20(2):348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00877.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
To date, no detailed examination of the pattern of change in reaction time performance for different sensory modalities has been conducted across the circadian cycle during sleep deprivation. Therefore, we compared sustained auditory and visual attention performance during 40h of sleep deprivation assessing multiple metrics of auditory and visual psychomotor vigilance tasks (PVT). Forty healthy participants (14 women) aged 30.8±8.6years were studied. Subjects were scheduled for an ∼8h sleep schedule at home prior to three-six laboratory baseline days with an 8 h sleep schedule followed by 40h sleep deprivation. Visual and auditory PVTs were 10min in duration, and were administered every 2h during sleep deprivation. Data were analysed with mixed-model anova. Sleep deprivation and circadian phase increased response time, lapses, anticipations, standard deviation of response times and time on task decrements for visual and auditory PVTs. In general, auditory vigilance was faster and less variable than visual vigilance, with larger differences between auditory and visual PVT during sleep deprivation versus baseline. Failures to respond to stimuli within 10s were four times more likely to occur to visual versus auditory stimuli. Our findings highlight that lapses during sleep deprivation are more than just long responses due to eye closure or visual distraction. Furthermore, our findings imply that the general pattern of change in attention during sleep deprivation (e.g. circadian variation, response slowing, lapsing and anticipations, time on task decrements and state instability) is similar among sensory-motor behavioral response modalities.
迄今为止,在睡眠剥夺期间的整个昼夜节律周期内,尚未对不同感觉模式的反应时性能变化模式进行详细检查。因此,我们比较了在 40 小时睡眠剥夺期间持续的听觉和视觉注意力表现,评估了听觉和视觉精神运动警戒任务(PVT)的多个指标。共有 40 名健康参与者(14 名女性),年龄 30.8±8.6 岁。在进行三个六天的实验室基线之前,受试者在家中安排了大约 8 小时的睡眠时间,随后进行了 8 小时的睡眠和 40 小时的睡眠剥夺。视觉和听觉 PVT 持续 10 分钟,在睡眠剥夺期间每 2 小时进行一次。数据采用混合模型方差分析进行分析。睡眠剥夺和昼夜节律相位增加了视觉和听觉 PVT 的反应时间、失误、预期、反应时间标准差和任务时间减少。一般来说,听觉警戒比视觉警戒更快,变异性更小,在睡眠剥夺与基线相比,听觉和视觉 PVT 之间的差异更大。在 10 秒内未能对刺激做出反应,发生视觉刺激的可能性是听觉刺激的四倍。我们的研究结果表明,在睡眠剥夺期间的失误不仅仅是由于闭眼或视觉干扰导致的长反应。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在睡眠剥夺期间注意力变化的一般模式(例如昼夜变化、反应速度减慢、失误和预期、任务时间减少和状态不稳定)在感觉运动行为反应模式中是相似的。