Burkholder Tanya H, Niel Lee, Weed James L, Brinster Lauren R, Bacher John D, Foltz Charmaine J
Division of Veterinary Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Jul;49(4):448-53.
In this study we compared rat (n = 16) responses to euthanasia with either gradual-fill CO(2) or rapid induction argon gas by evaluating the animals' heart rate via radiotelemetry, behavior, and vocalizations. We also evaluated the histologic effects of the gases. Rats were placed in an open test chamber 24 h before the start of the experiment. During baseline tests, rats were exposed to oxygen to evaluate the effects of the noise and movement of gas entering the chamber; 1 wk later, rats were euthanized by gas displacement with either 10%/min CO(2) or 50%/min argon gas. Rats tended to have higher heart rats and were more active during the baseline test, but these parameters were normal before the euthanasia experiment, suggesting that the rats had acclimated to the equipment. Heart rate, behavior, and ultrasonic vocalizations were recorded for 2 min after gas introduction in both groups. All rats appeared conscious throughout the test interval. The heart rates of rats exposed to argon did not change, whereas those of rats exposed to CO(2) declined significantly. Unlike those exposed to CO(2), rats euthanized with argon gas gasped and demonstrated seizure-like activity. There were no differences in the pulmonary lesions resulting from death by either gas. Our results suggest that argon as a sole euthanasia agent is aversive to rats. CO(2) using a 10%/min displacement may be less aversive than more rapid displacements. Future research investigating methods of euthanasia should allow sufficient time for the rats to acclimate to the test apparatus.
在本研究中,我们通过无线电遥测、行为和发声来评估大鼠(n = 16)对采用逐渐充入二氧化碳或快速诱导氩气进行安乐死的反应。我们还评估了这些气体的组织学影响。在实验开始前24小时,将大鼠置于开放的测试箱中。在基线测试期间,让大鼠暴露于氧气中,以评估气体进入箱体时的噪音和移动所产生的影响;1周后,用10%/分钟的二氧化碳或50%/分钟的氩气通过气体置换法对大鼠实施安乐死。在基线测试期间,大鼠的心率往往较高且更为活跃,但在安乐死实验前这些参数是正常的,这表明大鼠已适应了该设备。在两组中,气体引入后记录2分钟的心率、行为和超声发声情况。在整个测试期间,所有大鼠看起来都是清醒的。暴露于氩气的大鼠心率没有变化,而暴露于二氧化碳的大鼠心率则显著下降。与暴露于二氧化碳的大鼠不同,用氩气安乐死的大鼠会喘气并表现出癫痫样活动。两种气体导致的死亡所引起的肺部病变没有差异。我们的结果表明,氩气作为单一的安乐死剂对大鼠是有害的。以10%/分钟的置换速度使用二氧化碳可能比更快的置换速度危害更小。未来关于安乐死方法的研究应给予大鼠足够的时间来适应测试设备。