Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402-6170, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1030-48. doi: 10.1037/a0020384.
We apply instrumental variables (IV) techniques to a pooled data set of employment-focused experiments to examine the relation between type of preschool childcare and subsequent externalizing problem behavior for a large sample of low-income children. To assess the potential usefulness of this approach for addressing biases that can confound causal inferences in child care research, we compare instrumental variables results with those obtained using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. We find that our OLS estimates concur with prior studies showing small positive associations between center-based care and later externalizing behavior. By contrast, our IV estimates indicate that preschool-aged children with center care experience are rated by mothers and teachers as having fewer externalizing problems on entering elementary school than their peers who were not in child care as preschoolers. Findings are discussed in relation to the literature on associations between different types of community-based child care and children's social behavior, particularly within low-income populations. Moreover, we use this study to highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of each analytic method for addressing causal questions in developmental research.
我们运用工具变量(IV)技术对一组聚焦就业的实验的汇总数据进行分析,以考察大规模低收入儿童样本中,学前儿童保育的类型与随后外化问题行为之间的关系。为了评估这种方法在解决可能混淆儿童保育研究因果推断的偏差方面的潜在有用性,我们将工具变量的结果与使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归得到的结果进行了比较。我们发现,我们的 OLS 估计与先前的研究结果一致,表明中心式保育与后期外化行为之间存在较小的正相关关系。相比之下,我们的 IV 估计表明,与没有接受过学前保育的同龄人相比,进入小学时,接受过中心保育的学龄前儿童在母亲和教师的评价中,外化问题较少。研究结果与关于不同类型的基于社区的儿童保育与儿童社会行为之间的关系的文献进行了讨论,特别是在低收入人群中。此外,我们利用这项研究强调了每种分析方法在解决发展研究中的因果问题方面的相对优势和劣势。