Suppr超能文献

在血管内治疗时代,是否应该降低择期腹主动脉瘤修复的大小阈值?是的。

Should the size threshold for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair be lowered in the endovascular era? Yes.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Angiology. 2010 Oct;61(7):617-9. doi: 10.1177/0003319710375084.

Abstract

According to current international guidelines, patients with infrarenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) measuring > or = 5.5 cm should undergo repair to reduce the risk of rupture. The 5.5-cm-diameter threshold is the size when the AAA rupture rate balances the mortality rates of elective open surgical AAA repair (3%). Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative mortality and complication rates compared with open surgical repair. This debate addresses the issue whether the current size threshold for elective AAA repair needs to be lowered in the endovascular era. This paper supports the position that the size threshold for AAA repair should be lowered in the endovascular era.

摘要

根据当前国际指南,对于肾下型或肾周型腹主动脉瘤(AAA)直径大于或等于 5.5 厘米的患者,应进行修复以降低破裂风险。5.5 厘米的直径阈值是 AAA 破裂率与择期开放手术 AAA 修复(3%)死亡率平衡的大小。与开放手术修复相比,血管内 AAA 修复(EVAR)与较低的围手术期死亡率和并发症发生率相关。本次辩论讨论了在血管内时代是否需要降低择期 AAA 修复的当前大小阈值的问题。本文支持在血管内时代降低 AAA 修复的大小阈值的立场。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验