Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.
Dent Mater J. 2010 Oct;29(5):623-30. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2010-028. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dentin bonding durability of three HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives after one-year water storage and to measure the amounts of their water sorption/solubility. OptiBond All-In-One (OP), Bond Force (BF) and Clearfil S³Bond (S³) were applied to the dentin surfaces according to manufacturers' instructions. Bond strengths to dentin were determined using µTBS test after water storage for 24 hours, six months, and one year. In addition, water sorption and solubility of the polymerized adhesives were measured. The µTBS of S³ and OP significantly decreased after one year. On the other hand, for BF there were no significant differences in µTBS between all storage periods. There were significant differences in water sorption and solubility among the adhesives (BF>S³>OP). The initial amounts of water sorption and solubility of the three adhesives did not affect their bonding durability to dentin.
本研究旨在评估三种含 HEMA 的一步自酸蚀黏合剂在一年水储存后的牙本质黏结耐久性,并测量其吸水率/溶解度。OptiBond All-In-One(OP)、Bond Force(BF)和 Clearfil S³Bond(S³)按照制造商的说明应用于牙本质表面。在水储存 24 小时、6 个月和 1 年后,使用 µTBS 测试测定黏结至牙本质的强度。此外,还测量了聚合黏合剂的吸水率和溶解度。S³和 OP 的 µTBS 在一年后显著降低。另一方面,对于 BF,所有储存期之间的 µTBS 没有显著差异。黏合剂的吸水率和溶解度存在显著差异(BF>S³>OP)。三种黏合剂的初始吸水率和溶解度与其对牙本质的黏结耐久性无关。