Suppr超能文献

50 年综合医学期刊的命运与影响。

Fifty-year fate and impact of general medical journals.

机构信息

Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina Medical School, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 1;5(9):e12531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012531.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Influential medical journals shape medical science and practice and their prestige is usually appraised by citation impact metrics, such as the journal impact factor. However, how permanent are medical journals and how stable is their impact over time?

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated what happened to general medical journals that were publishing papers half a century ago, in 1959. Data were retrieved from ISI Web of Science for citations and PubMed (Journals function) for journal history. Of 27 eligible journals publishing in 1959, 4 have stopped circulation (including two of the most prestigious journals in 1959) and another 7 changed name between 1959 and 2009. Only 6 of these 27 journals have been published continuously with their initial name since they started circulation. The citation impact of papers published in 1959 gives a very different picture from the current journal impact factor; the correlation between the two is non-significant and very close to zero. Only 13 of the 5,223 papers published in 1959 received at least 5 citations in 2009.

CONCLUSIONS

Journals are more permanent entities than single papers, but they are also subject to major change and their relative prominence can change markedly over time.

摘要

背景

有影响力的医学期刊塑造了医学科学和实践,其威望通常通过引文影响指标来评估,如期刊影响因子。然而,医学期刊的持久性如何,它们的影响力随时间的稳定性如何?

方法和结果

我们评估了半个世纪前,即 1959 年出版论文的普通医学期刊发生了什么。从 ISI Web of Science 检索引文数据,从 PubMed(期刊功能)检索期刊历史数据。在 1959 年符合条件的 27 种期刊中,有 4 种停止发行(包括 1959 年最负盛名的两种期刊),另外 7 种期刊在 1959 年至 2009 年期间更改了名称。在这些 27 种期刊中,只有 6 种期刊自发行以来一直以最初的名称连续出版。1959 年发表的论文的引文影响与当前的期刊影响因子形成鲜明对比;两者之间的相关性不显著,几乎为零。在 1959 年发表的 5223 篇论文中,只有 13 篇在 2009 年获得了至少 5 次引用。

结论

期刊是比单篇论文更持久的实体,但它们也会发生重大变化,其相对重要性会随时间显著变化。

相似文献

1
Fifty-year fate and impact of general medical journals.
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 1;5(9):e12531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012531.
4
Evolution of the scientific literature of cytochrome P450 from 1977 to 2008.
Curr Drug Metab. 2010 Feb;11(2):162-70. doi: 10.2174/138920010791110845.
5
Classic citations in main plastic and reconstructive surgery journals.
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jul;71(1):103-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824189ba.
6
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
7
Citation classics in suicide and life threatening behavior: a research note.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012 Dec;42(6):628-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.00117.x. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
8
The Impact Factor Is a 20th-Century Relic in an Electronic Journal World of Instant Citation Counts.
J Histochem Cytochem. 2017 Jul;65(7):387-388. doi: 10.1369/0022155417712485.
9
Citation distribution profile in Brazilian journals of general medicine.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2012;130(5):314-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000500008.
10
A historical review of classic articles in surgery field.
Am J Surg. 2014 Nov;208(5):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
comes of age.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 19;29:100559. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100559. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Do review articles boost journal impact factors? A longitudinal analysis for five pharmacology journals.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;391(9):1033-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00210-018-1529-x. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Beyond the impact factor?
Evid Based Ment Health. 2015 May;18(2):33-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102087. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Impact factor--a useful tool, but not for all purposes.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Apr;109(15):267-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0267. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
6
Citation marketing and networking.
Naturwissenschaften. 2011 Aug;98(8):717-8. doi: 10.1007/s00114-011-0812-1. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping change in large networks.
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 27;5(1):e8694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008694.
2
Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.012. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
3
The dynamic interest in topics within the biomedical scientific community.
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 7;4(8):e6544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006544.
4
A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 29;4(6):e6022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
5
Why current publication practices may distort science.
PLoS Med. 2008 Oct 7;5(10):e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201.
6
Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship.
Science. 2008 Jul 18;321(5887):395-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1150473.
9
The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.
PLoS Med. 2006 Jun;3(6):e291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
10
The trouble with medical journals.
J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):115-9. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900311.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验