Suppr超能文献

对有乳腺癌病史女性潮热的非激素干预措施。

Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

作者信息

Rada Gabriel, Capurro Daniel, Pantoja Tomas, Corbalán Javiera, Moreno Gladys, Letelier Luz M, Vera Claudio

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Evidence Based Health Care Program, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Lira 44, Decanato Primer piso, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD004923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004923.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hot flushes are common in women with a history of breast cancer. Hormonal therapies are known to reduce these symptoms but are not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer due to their potential adverse effects. The efficacy of non-hormonal therapies is still uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of non-hormonal therapies in reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, PsycINFO (August 2008) and WHO ICTRP Search Portal. We handsearched reference lists of reviews and included articles, reviewed conference proceedings and contacted experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-hormonal therapies with placebo or no therapy for reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected potentially relevant studies, decided upon their inclusion and extracted data on participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes and the risk of bias of included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We included six studies on selective serotonin (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine (SNRI) reuptake inhibitors, two on clonidine, one on gabapentin, two each on relaxation therapy and homeopathy, and one each on vitamin E, magnetic devices and acupuncture. The risk of bias of most studies was rated as low or moderate. Data on continuous outcomes were presented inconsistently among studies, which precluded the possibility of pooling the results. Three pharmacological treatments (SSRIs and SNRIs, clonidine and gabapentin) reduced the number and severity of hot flushes. One study assessing vitamin E did not show any beneficial effect. One of two studies on relaxation therapy showed a significant benefit. None of the other non-pharmacological therapies had a significant benefit. Side-effects were inconsistently reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine, SSRIs and SNRIs, gabapentin and relaxation therapy showed a mild to moderate effect on reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

摘要

背景

潮热在有乳腺癌病史的女性中很常见。已知激素疗法可减轻这些症状,但由于其潜在的不良反应,不推荐用于有乳腺癌病史的女性。非激素疗法的疗效仍不确定。

目的

评估非激素疗法对减轻有乳腺癌病史女性潮热症状的疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane乳腺癌协作组专业注册库、CENTRAL(Cochrane图书馆)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS、CINAHL、PsycINFO(2008年8月)以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台搜索门户。我们手工检索了综述和纳入文献中的参考文献列表,查阅了会议论文集并联系了专家。

选择标准

比较非激素疗法与安慰剂或不治疗对减轻有乳腺癌病史女性潮热症状的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立选择潜在相关研究,确定纳入研究,并提取有关参与者特征、干预措施、结局以及纳入研究偏倚风险的数据。

主要结果

16项RCT符合我们的纳入标准。我们纳入了6项关于选择性5-羟色胺(SSRI)和5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素(SNRI)再摄取抑制剂的研究、2项关于可乐定的研究、1项关于加巴喷丁的研究、2项关于放松疗法的研究、2项关于顺势疗法的研究,以及1项关于维生素E、磁疗设备和针灸的研究。大多数研究的偏倚风险被评为低或中度。各研究中关于连续结局的数据呈现不一致,这排除了汇总结果的可能性。三种药物治疗(SSRI和SNRI、可乐定和加巴喷丁)减少了潮热的次数和严重程度。一项评估维生素E的研究未显示出任何有益效果。两项放松疗法研究中的一项显示有显著益处。其他非药物疗法均未显示出显著益处。副作用报告不一致。

作者结论

可乐定、SSRI和SNRI、加巴喷丁以及放松疗法对减轻有乳腺癌病史女性的潮热症状显示出轻度至中度效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验