• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚老年护理院药物相关问题的回顾性研究:药剂师和全科医生参与的药物评估。

A retrospective study of drug-related problems in Australian aged care homes: medication reviews involving pharmacists and general practitioners.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x
PMID:20825538
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-related problems (DRPs) in Australian aged care homes have been studied previously. However, little is known about the acceptance and implementation of pharmacists' recommendations by general practitioners (GPs) to resolve DRPs.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the number and nature of DRPs identified by accredited clinical pharmacists. The secondary objective was to study the GP acceptance and implementation of pharmacist recommendations to resolve DRPs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 500 randomly selected, de-identified medication reviews performed by 10 accredited clinical pharmacists over 6 months across 62 aged care homes. The DRPs identified by pharmacists were subsequently classified by the drugs involved, types of problem (indication, effectiveness and safety) and medical diagnoses of the patient. GP written feedback on the medication review reports determined implementation of pharmacists' recommendations to resolve the DRPs.

RESULTS

A total of 1433 DRPs were identified in 480 of the 500 residents. Potential DRPs were frequently classified as risk of adverse drug reactions, need for additional monitoring and inappropriate choice of a drug. Alimentary, cardiovascular, central nervous system and respiratory drugs were most frequently implicated, accounting for more than 75% of the DRPs. GPs' acceptance and implementation of pharmacists recommendations were 72.5% (95% CI; 70.2, 74.8) and 58.1% (95% CI; 55.5, 60.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 96% of the residents had potential DRPs identified by pharmacists. GP acceptance of pharmacists' recommendations was independent of the drug category, but not independent of the disease category.

摘要

背景

先前已经对澳大利亚老年护理院的药物相关问题(DRP)进行了研究。但是,对于药剂师为解决 DRP 而提出的建议被全科医生(GP)接受和执行的情况,人们知之甚少。

目的

本研究的主要目的是调查经认证的临床药剂师确定的 DRP 的数量和性质。次要目的是研究 GP 对解决 DRP 的药剂师建议的接受和执行情况。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,对 62 家老年护理院的 10 名经认证的临床药剂师在 6 个月内随机选择的 500 份药物评估进行了分析。药剂师确定的 DRP 随后根据涉及的药物、问题类型(适应症、疗效和安全性)和患者的医疗诊断进行分类。根据药物评估报告中 GP 的书面反馈来确定药剂师建议解决 DRP 的实施情况。

结果

在 500 名居民中,有 480 名居民确定了 1433 个 DRP。潜在的 DRP 通常被归类为药物不良反应的风险、需要额外监测和药物选择不当。胃肠道、心血管、中枢神经系统和呼吸系统药物最常涉及,占 DRP 的 75%以上。GP 对药剂师建议的接受和执行率分别为 72.5%(95%CI;70.2,74.8)和 58.1%(95%CI;55.5,60.6)。

结论

超过 96%的居民被药剂师确定存在潜在的 DRP。GP 对药剂师建议的接受情况与药物类别无关,但与疾病类别有关。

相似文献

1
A retrospective study of drug-related problems in Australian aged care homes: medication reviews involving pharmacists and general practitioners.澳大利亚老年护理院药物相关问题的回顾性研究:药剂师和全科医生参与的药物评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
2
Characteristic of drug-related problems and pharmacists' interventions in a stroke unit in Thailand.药物相关问题的特征及药师在泰国卒中单元的干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Aug;41(4):880-887. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00832-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
Impact of the pharmacist medication review services on drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing of renally cleared medications in residents of aged care facilities.药剂师药物审查服务对老年护理机构居民药物相关问题及经肾脏清除药物潜在不适当处方的影响。
Drugs Aging. 2014 Nov;31(11):825-35. doi: 10.1007/s40266-014-0208-y.
4
Effects of medication reviews on use of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients; a cross-sectional study in Swedish primary care.药物审查对老年患者潜在不适当用药的影响;瑞典初级保健领域的一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3425-y.
5
Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities.药剂师主导的德国长期护理机构老年居民药物治疗审查。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1052-z.
6
Optimizing the pharmacotherapy of vascular surgery patients by medication reconciliation.通过药物重整优化血管外科患者的药物治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):175-81.
7
Osteoporosis management in Australian aged care facilities: a mixed method study.澳大利亚老年护理机构中的骨质疏松症管理:一项混合方法研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 May 14;19(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01401-7.
8
Effects of medication review on drug-related problems in patients using automated drug-dispensing systems: a pragmatic randomized controlled study.药物审查对使用自动发药系统患者药物相关问题的影响:一项实用随机对照研究。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Apr 1;28(4):305-14. doi: 10.2165/11586850-000000000-00000.
9
Assessment of drug-related problems at the emergency department in older patients living with frailty: pharmacist-led medication reviews within a geriatric care team.评估衰弱老年患者在急诊科的药物相关问题:老年护理团队中以药剂师为主导的药物审查。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03942-x.
10
Clinical medication reviews in elderly patients with polypharmacy: a cross-sectional study on drug-related problems in the Netherlands.老年多重用药患者的临床用药评估:荷兰药物相关问题的横断面研究
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0199-8. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting of initiation and factors associated with antidepressant use on entry to long-term care facilities.长期护理机构入住时抗抑郁药使用的起始背景及相关因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;91(6):1749-1759. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16403. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Pharmacist-led intervention for older people with atrial fibrillation in long-term care (PIVOTALL study): a randomised pilot and feasibility study.药师主导的长期护理中心老年心房颤动患者干预(PIVOTALL 研究):一项随机试点和可行性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 16;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04527-4.
3
The role of on-site pharmacist in residential aged care facilities: findings from the PiRACF study.
驻场药剂师在老年护理机构中的作用:PiRACF研究结果
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Jul 3;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00587-4.
4
What types of information do pharmacists include in comprehensive medication management review reports? A qualitative content analysis.药师在综合药物管理审查报告中包含哪些类型的信息?一项定性内容分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Jun;45(3):712-721. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01561-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Medicine-related problems: A recurrent issue among residents living in nursing homes.与医学相关的问题:养老院居民中反复出现的一个问题。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 29;13:978871. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.978871. eCollection 2022.
6
Pharmacist's time spent: Space for Pharmacy-based Interventions and Consultation TimE (SPICE)-an observational time and motion study.药剂师的工作时间:基于药学的干预和咨询时间(SPICE)的观察时间和运动研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 2;12(3):e055597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055597.
7
How Do Pharmacists Practice in Aged Care? A Narrative Review of Models from Australia, England, and the United States of America.药剂师如何在老年护理中实践?来自澳大利亚、英国和美国的模式的叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312773.
8
Integrating pharmacists into aged care facilities to improve the quality use of medicine (PiRACF Study): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.将药剂师整合到老年护理设施中以提高药物的合理使用(PiRACF 研究):一项群组随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 11;22(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05335-0.
9
Probing pharmacists' interventions in Long-Term Care: a systematic review.探究长期护理中药师的干预措施:系统评价。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Aug;12(4):673-693. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00469-5. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Reducing medicine-induced deterioration and adverse reactions (ReMInDAR) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in residential aged-care facilities assessing frailty as the primary outcome.减少药物引起的恶化和不良反应(ReMInDAR)试验:一项在养老院中评估衰弱作为主要结局的随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 22;10(4):e032851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032851.