• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在种植手术中,咬骨钳收集的自体骨与骨滤网收集的自体骨的细菌污染情况比较。

Bacterial contamination of autogenous bone collected by rongeur compared with that collected by bone filter during implant surgery.

作者信息

Hashemi Hamid Mahmood, Beshkar Majid

机构信息

Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Kargar St., Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;49(6):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.08.003
PMID:20828895
Abstract

The aim was to compare the degree of microbial contamination of autogenous bone collected by a bone filter with that of autogenous bone harvested by a rongeur during implant surgery. Thirty healthy patients had dental implants inserted. A strict aspiration protocol was used during the operation to collect particulate bone with minimal risk of contamination by oral flora. A fragment of bone (mainly from the tuberosity) was also harvested with a rongeur. Samples from both groups were sent to the laboratory for the microbes to be counted. All samples yielded viable micro-organisms. There was no significant difference between the number of aerobes in the bone filter and those in the bone fragment group (p=0.9). However, there were significantly more anaerobes in the bone filter group than in the bone fragment group. There were significantly more micro-organisms (both aerobes and anaerobes) in the bone filter group than the bone fragment group (p=0.0001). Even with the use of a stringent aspiration protocol the degree of bacterial contamination was significantly higher in collected bone debris than in bone harvested by rongeur during implant surgery.

摘要

目的是比较在种植手术中,使用骨过滤器收集的自体骨与使用咬骨钳获取的自体骨的微生物污染程度。30名健康患者接受了牙种植体植入。手术过程中采用严格的抽吸方案,以收集受口腔菌群污染风险最小的颗粒状骨。还用咬骨钳获取了一块骨碎片(主要来自结节)。两组样本均送至实验室进行微生物计数。所有样本均培养出活的微生物。骨过滤器组中的需氧菌数量与骨碎片组中的需氧菌数量之间无显著差异(p = 0.9)。然而,骨过滤器组中的厌氧菌数量明显多于骨碎片组。骨过滤器组中的微生物(需氧菌和厌氧菌)数量明显多于骨碎片组(p = 0.0001)。即使采用严格的抽吸方案,在种植手术中,收集的骨碎片中的细菌污染程度仍明显高于用咬骨钳获取的骨中的细菌污染程度。

相似文献

1
Bacterial contamination of autogenous bone collected by rongeur compared with that collected by bone filter during implant surgery.在种植手术中,咬骨钳收集的自体骨与骨滤网收集的自体骨的细菌污染情况比较。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;49(6):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
2
Bacterial contamination levels of autogenous bone particles collected by 3 different techniques for harvesting intraoral bone grafts.通过3种不同技术采集口腔内骨移植自体骨颗粒的细菌污染水平。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;73(3):424-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
Osseous coagulum collected in bone traps: potential for bacterial contamination and methods for decontamination.
J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(3):109-15. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[109:OCCIBT]2.0.CO;2.
4
Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected from dental implant sites via osteotomy: a review.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Nov;106(5):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.041. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
5
[Bone collected with a bone collector during dental implant surgery].[在种植牙手术期间用骨采集器采集的骨组织]
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005 Jan;9(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s10006-004-0564-6.
6
A systematic review of the effectiveness of bone collectors.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):729-35.
7
Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected during dental implant site preparation: a pilot study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):656-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
8
Microbial analysis of the autogenous bone collected by bone filter during oral surgery: a clinical study.口腔手术中通过骨滤器采集的自体骨的微生物分析:一项临床研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.07.016.
9
Piezoelectric osteotomy for intraoral harvesting of bone blocks.用于口内获取骨块的压电截骨术。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Apr;27(2):127-31.
10
Effect of implant drill design on the particle size of the bone collected during osteotomy.种植体钻头设计对截骨术中采集的骨屑颗粒大小的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Oct;39(10):1007-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of amoxicillin and clindamycin on the gene expression of markers involved in osteoblast physiology.阿莫西林和克林霉素对成骨细胞生理相关标志物基因表达的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):990-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
2
Lateral Window Osteotomy in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: Does a Combination of Two Surgical Protocols Offer Any Advantage? A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome.上颌窦提升术中的外侧开窗截骨术:两种手术方案的联合应用是否具有优势?临床结果的回顾性分析
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Sep;20(3):470-478. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01552-x. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
3
High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.
细菌在块状骨移植材料上的高粘附潜力。
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 1;13(9):2102. doi: 10.3390/ma13092102.
4
The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reducing Bacterial Contamination of Autologous Bone Graft Collected from Implant Site.抗生素预防在减少种植体部位自体骨移植物细菌污染中的作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2175019. doi: 10.1155/2017/2175019. Epub 2017 Dec 20.