冷水浸泡与高热治疗:以 38.6°C 作为直肠安全降温限度。

Cold-water immersion and the treatment of hyperthermia: using 38.6°C as a safe rectal temperature cooling limit.

机构信息

Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2010 Sep-Oct;45(5):439-44. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.5.439.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Cold-water immersion is recommended for the immediate field treatment of exertional heat stroke. However, concerns exist over potential overcooling of hyperthermic individuals during cold-water immersion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the recommendation that removing previously hyperthermic individuals from a cold-water bath at a rectal temperature (T(re)) of 38.6°C would attenuate overcooling.

DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 6 men and 4 women (age  =  22 ± 3 years, height  =  172 ± 10 cm, mass  =  67.8 ± 10.7 kg, body fat percentage  =  17.1% ± 4.5%, maximum oxygen consumption  =  59.3 ± 8.7 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)).

INTERVENTION(S): After exercising at an ambient temperature of 40.0°C for 38.5 ± 9.4 minutes, until T(re) reached 39.5°C, participants were immersed in a 2.0°C circulated water bath until T(re) decreased to either 37.5°C or 38.6°C. Subsequently, participants were removed from the water bath and recovered for 20 minutes at an ambient temperature of 25°C.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rectal and esophageal temperatures were measured continuously during the immersion and recovery periods.

RESULTS

Because of the experimental design, the overall time of immersion was greater during the 37.5°C trial (16.6 ± 5.7 minutes) than the 38.6°C trial (8.8 ± 2.6 minutes) (t(9)  =  -4.740, P  =  .001). During the recovery period after cold-water immersion, both rectal (F(1,9)  =  50.540, P < .001) and esophageal (F(1,6)  =  20.365, P  =  .007) temperatures remained greater in the 38.6°C trial than in the 37.5°C trial. This was evidenced by low points of 36.47°C ± 0.70°C and 37.19°C ± 0.71°C for rectal temperature (t(9)  =  2.975, P  =  .016) and of 35.67°C ± 1.27°C and 36.72°C ± 0.95°C for esophageal temperature (t(6)  =  3.963, P  =  .007) during the recovery period of the 37.5°C and 38.6°C trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Immersion for approximately 9 minutes to a rectal temperature cooling limit of 38.6°C negated any risk associated with overcooling hyperthermic individuals when they were immersed in 2°C water.

摘要

背景

冷水浸浴被推荐用于运动性热射病的现场即时治疗。然而,人们对在冷水中浸浴时高热个体可能过度冷却的问题存在担忧。

目的

评估将直肠温度(T(re))为 38.6°C 的过热个体从冷水中移出的建议是否会减轻过度冷却。

设计

对照实验室研究。

地点

大学研究实验室。

患者或其他参与者

纳入 6 名男性和 4 名女性(年龄=22±3 岁,身高=172±10cm,体重=67.8±10.7kg,体脂百分比=17.1%±4.5%,最大摄氧量=59.3±8.7mL·kg(-1)·min(-1))。

干预

在环境温度为 40.0°C 的情况下运动 38.5±9.4 分钟,直至 T(re)达到 39.5°C,参与者浸入 2.0°C 的循环水浴中,直到 T(re)降至 37.5°C 或 38.6°C。随后,将参与者从水中移出,并在环境温度为 25°C 的情况下恢复 20 分钟。

主要观察指标

直肠和食管温度在浸浴和恢复期间连续测量。

结果

由于实验设计,37.5°C 试验的总体浸浴时间(16.6±5.7 分钟)长于 38.6°C 试验(8.8±2.6 分钟)(t(9) =-4.740,P=.001)。在冷水浸浴后的恢复期,直肠(F(1,9)=50.540,P<.001)和食管(F(1,6)=20.365,P=.007)温度在 38.6°C 试验中均高于 37.5°C 试验。这一点从直肠温度的低体温点(36.47°C±0.70°C 和 37.19°C±0.71°C)(t(9)=2.975,P=.016)和食管温度的低体温点(35.67°C±1.27°C 和 36.72°C±0.95°C)(t(6)=3.963,P=.007)可以看出,这些低体温点分别出现在 37.5°C 和 38.6°C 试验的恢复期。

结论

直肠温度冷却至 38.6°C 左右的 9 分钟浸浴时间消除了将过热个体浸入 2°C 水中时过度冷却的任何风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索