Suppr超能文献

一项对度洛西汀和文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的系统评价,包括未发表的数据。

A systematic review of duloxetine and venlafaxine in major depression, including unpublished data.

机构信息

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2011 Apr;123(4):247-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01599.x. Epub 2010 Sep 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the short-term antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine and venlafaxine vs. each other, placebo, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and tri- and tetracyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in adults with major depression.

METHOD

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials identified through bibliographical databases and other sources, including unpublished manufacturer reports.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies including venlafaxine arms (n = 12,816), 14 including duloxetine arms (n = 4,528), and two direct comparisons (n = 836) were analysed. Twenty-three studies were previously unpublished. In the meta-analysis, both duloxetine and venlafaxine showed superior efficacy (higher remission and response rates) and inferior tolerability (higher discontinuation rates due to adverse events) to placebo. Venlafaxine had superior efficacy in response rates but inferior tolerability to SSRIs (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35 and 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.66, respectively), and no differences in efficacy and tolerability to TCAs. Duloxetine did not show any advantages over other antidepressants and was less well tolerated than SSRIs and venlafaxine (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.13 and OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16-2.78, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Rather than being a first-line option, venlafaxine appears to be a valid alternative in patients who do not tolerate or respond to SSRIs or TCAs. Duloxetine does not seem to be indicated as a first-line treatment.

摘要

目的

比较度洛西汀和文拉法辛与其他药物(安慰剂、选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 [SSRIs]、三环和四环抗抑郁药 [TCAs])治疗成人抑郁症的短期抗抑郁疗效和耐受性。

方法

通过文献数据库和其他来源(包括未发表的制造商报告)对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。

结果

分析了 54 项包括文拉法辛组(n = 12816)的研究、14 项包括度洛西汀组(n = 4528)的研究和 2 项直接比较研究(n = 836)。其中 23 项研究之前未发表。荟萃分析显示,度洛西汀和文拉法辛均优于安慰剂,疗效更好(缓解率和应答率更高),耐受性更差(因不良反应而停药率更高)。文拉法辛在应答率方面优于 SSRIs,但耐受性更差(OR = 1.20,95%CI 1.07-1.35 和 1.38,95%CI 1.15-1.66),与 TCAs 相比,疗效和耐受性无差异。度洛西汀与其他抗抑郁药相比没有任何优势,且耐受性不如 SSRIs 和文拉法辛(OR = 1.53,95%CI 1.10-2.13 和 OR 1.79,95%CI 1.16-2.78)。

结论

文拉法辛似乎不是 SSRIs 或 TCAs 不耐受或无效患者的一线选择,而是一种有效的替代药物。度洛西汀似乎不适宜作为一线治疗药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验