Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, CA 3000, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Nov;67(11):744-50. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.049874. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
To examine the effects of different timing of structured interventions for workers on sick leave due to low back pain on return to work (RTW), and the consequences for costs and benefits.
Literature reviews were conducted to identify RTW curves and to estimate treatment effects, costs and benefits of structured interventions among workers on sick leave due to low back pain. RTW curves were mathematically described by Weibull functions and intervention effects, expressed by hazard ratios, were used to adjust these Weibull functions. Subsequently, these functions were used to evaluate the theoretical effects of interventions on reduction in number of days on sick leave and on the benefit-cost ratio.
The cost-benefits of a RTW intervention among workers on sick leave due to low back pain were determined by the estimated effectiveness of the intervention, the costs of the intervention, the natural course of RTW in the target population, the timing of the enrolment of subjects into the intervention, and the duration of the intervention.
With a good RTW in the first weeks, the only early interventions likely to be cost-beneficial are inexpensive work-focused enhancements to early routine care, such as accommodating workplaces. Structured interventions are unlikely to have an additional impact on the already good prognosis when offered before the optimal time window at approximately 8 to 12 weeks. The generalisibility of the effectiveness of a RTW intervention depends on the comparability of baseline characteristics and RTW curves in target and source populations.
探讨不同时间实施针对因腰痛休病假工人的结构化干预措施对其重返工作岗位(RTW)的效果,以及对成本和效益的影响。
系统综述旨在确定 RTW 曲线,并估计结构化干预措施对腰痛休病假工人 RTW 的治疗效果、成本和效益。通过威布尔函数对 RTW 曲线进行数学描述,并使用风险比表示干预效果,以调整这些威布尔函数。随后,利用这些函数评估干预措施对减少病假天数和收益成本比的理论效果。
腰痛休病假工人的 RTW 干预的成本效益取决于干预的估计效果、干预的成本、目标人群 RTW 的自然过程、对受试者进行干预的时间以及干预的持续时间。
在最初几周有较好的 RTW 情况下,只有早期以工作为重点、对早期常规护理进行少量投资的干预措施,例如改善工作场所,可能具有成本效益。在大约 8 至 12 周的最佳时间窗口之前提供结构化干预措施,不太可能对已经良好的预后产生额外影响。RTW 干预效果的普遍性取决于目标人群和来源人群的基线特征和 RTW 曲线的可比性。