The Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sleep Breath. 2011 Sep;15(3):571-7. doi: 10.1007/s11325-010-0405-9. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
The objectives of this study are to test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and to assess the relationship between the ESS score and the severity of obstructive sleep disordered breathing.
A total of 228 subjects (149 males and 79 females) were recruited. In order to check the discriminant validity of the ESS, we included 32 healthy volunteers and 39 patients with primary snoring to be the control groups and 126 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) confirmed by full polysomnography to be the disease groups. The test-retest reliability was investigated in 71 subjects. To check the responsiveness properties of the questionnaire, we asked a separate group of 31 patients who were successfully treated with either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or upper airway surgery to complete the ESS before and after treatment at 3-6 months.
The internal consistency demonstrated by Cronbach's alpha coefficients for standardized item was 0.87 and a range from 0.84 to 0.86 if some items were deleted. The test-retest reliability was shown by intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.79. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean of the ESS scores of the control groups (6.1 ± 3.0) and the OSA patients (9.9 ± 5.3) (p < 0.001). The ESS scores decreased significantly after a successful treatment with both CPAP and surgery (p < 0.001); however, there was no statistically significant difference among different severities of OSA.
Our Thai version of the ESS showed an excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. It is able to discriminate between control subjects and OSA patients and to assess the response of treatment; however, it has a weak relationship with the apnea-hypopnea index. Therefore, we recommend use it to combine with more comprehensive clinical evaluation in obstructive sleep disordered breathing patients.
本研究旨在检验泰国版 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)的信度和效度,并评估 ESS 评分与阻塞性睡眠呼吸障碍严重程度之间的关系。
共招募了 228 名受试者(149 名男性和 79 名女性)。为了检验 ESS 的判别效度,我们纳入了 32 名健康志愿者和 39 名原发性鼾症患者作为对照组,以及 126 名经全夜多导睡眠图(PSG)确诊的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者作为疾病组。71 名受试者进行了重测信度研究。为了检验问卷的反应度特性,我们让另一组 31 名经持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或上气道手术成功治疗的患者在治疗前和治疗后 3-6 个月分别填写 ESS。
标准化项目的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.87,如果删除某些项目则范围为 0.84-0.86。内部一致性良好。内部一致性通过组内相关系数为 0.79 来表示。对照组(6.1±3.0)和 OSA 患者(9.9±5.3)的 ESS 评分平均值之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。CPAP 和手术治疗后,ESS 评分显著降低(p<0.001);然而,不同严重程度的 OSA 之间无统计学显著差异。
我们的泰国版 ESS 显示出极好的内部一致性和重测信度。它能够区分对照组和 OSA 患者,并评估治疗反应;然而,它与呼吸暂停低通气指数的相关性较弱。因此,我们建议将其与阻塞性睡眠呼吸障碍患者更全面的临床评估相结合使用。