• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同物理治疗技术的长期对比试验;体位引流加叩击与自主引流在囊性纤维化治疗中的应用。

Long-term comparative trial of two different physiotherapy techniques; postural drainage with percussion and autogenic drainage, in the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

机构信息

Cystic Fibrosis Clinic, BC's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1064-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21247.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.21247
PMID:20836133
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In N. America, over the past decade, various airway clearance techniques (ACT) have been introduced for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF). We hypothesized that autogenic drainage (AD), an ACT developed in Belgium would be as effective as postural drainage with percussion (PD) in treating patients with CF.

METHODS

Thirty-six CF patients, aged 12-18 years, with Shwachman score 65-98, were enrolled in a 2-year cross-over trial. Patients were matched as pairs and members of each pair were randomly assigned to two groups. For the first study year, Group A performed PD while Group B performed AD. At the end of 1 year Groups A and B crossed over physiotherapy techniques. Clinical status and pulmonary function (FVC, FEV(1), FEF(25-75)) were measured at 3 monthly intervals. Only results from the first year of the study are reported, as 10 out of 17 patients who had completed performing AD for the first year refused to change back to PD for the second year.

RESULTS

During the first year of the study, both the AD and PD groups demonstrated improved pulmonary function with no significant difference between the two groups. Change in FVC and FEV(1) percent predicted for Groups A and B was 0.47 ± 1.65(se) versus 2.35 ± 1.51(se) and 2.09 ± 2.2(se) versus 0.92 ± 2.25(se). However, CF patients exhibited a marked preference for the AD technique. Results suggest that both AD and PD are effective methods of performing physiotherapy for CF patients and that the benefits of either technique are enhanced by measures which encourage adherence.

摘要

未加标签

在过去的十年中,北美地区引入了各种气道清除技术(ACT)来治疗囊性纤维化(CF)。我们假设,在比利时开发的自主引流(AD)作为一种 ACT,其在治疗 CF 患者方面的效果与体位引流加叩击(PD)一样有效。

方法

36 名年龄在 12-18 岁之间、Shwachman 评分在 65-98 分的 CF 患者参加了一项为期 2 年的交叉试验。患者按对匹配,并将每对中的成员随机分配到两组。在第一年研究中,A 组进行 PD,B 组进行 AD。在第 1 年末,A 组和 B 组交叉进行物理治疗。每 3 个月测量一次临床状况和肺功能(FVC、FEV1、FEF25-75)。仅报告研究第一年的结果,因为第一年完成 AD 治疗的 17 名患者中有 10 名拒绝在第二年恢复 PD。

结果

在研究的第一年,AD 和 PD 两组的肺功能都有所改善,但两组之间没有显著差异。A 组和 B 组的 FVC 和 FEV1 预计百分比变化分别为 0.47 ± 1.65(se)对 2.35 ± 1.51(se)和 2.09 ± 2.2(se)对 0.92 ± 2.25(se)。然而,CF 患者对 AD 技术表现出明显的偏好。结果表明,AD 和 PD 都是治疗 CF 患者的有效物理治疗方法,通过鼓励坚持的措施,任何一种技术的益处都可以得到增强。

相似文献

1
Long-term comparative trial of two different physiotherapy techniques; postural drainage with percussion and autogenic drainage, in the treatment of cystic fibrosis.两种不同物理治疗技术的长期对比试验;体位引流加叩击与自主引流在囊性纤维化治疗中的应用。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1064-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21247.
2
Long-term comparative trial of conventional postural drainage and percussion versus positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis.
J Pediatr. 1997 Oct;131(4):570-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70064-7.
3
Lung function in the aging Swedish cystic fibrosis population.瑞典老年囊性纤维化人群的肺功能。
Respir Med. 2009 Jul;103(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.020. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
4
The Short-Term Effect of Breathing Tasks Via an Incentive Spirometer on Lung Function Compared With Autogenic Drainage in Subjects With Cystic Fibrosis.与自主引流相比,激励肺量计呼吸任务对囊性纤维化患者肺功能的短期影响。
Respir Care. 2015 Dec;60(12):1819-25. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04008. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
5
A comparison of the therapeutic effectiveness of and preference for postural drainage and percussion, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and high-frequency chest wall compression in hospitalized cystic fibrosis patients.住院囊性纤维化患者中体位引流与叩击、肺内叩击通气及高频胸壁按压的治疗效果比较及偏好情况
Respir Care. 2003 Jan;48(1):24-8.
6
[Long-term evaluation of effectiveness for selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis].
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):245-57.
7
Adherence to airway clearance therapies by adult cystic fibrosis patients.成人囊性纤维化患者对气道清除治疗的依从性。
Respir Care. 2013 Feb;58(2):279-85. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01389.
8
Autogenic drainage: efficacy of a simplified method.
Acta Univ Carol Med (Praha). 1990;36(1-4):210-2.
9
Chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: short-term effects of autogenic drainage preceded by wet inhalation of saline versus autogenic drainage preceded by intrapulmonary percussive ventilation with saline.囊性纤维化的胸部物理治疗:盐水湿化吸入后进行自主引流与盐水肺内叩击通气后进行自主引流的短期效果比较
Respiration. 2008;76(2):175-80. doi: 10.1159/000111818. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
10
[Evaluation of the efficiency of selected thoracic physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis].[对用于治疗囊性纤维化患者的选定胸部物理治疗方法的疗效评估]
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2000 Jul-Sep;4(3):233-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.常规胸部物理治疗与其他气道清除技术在囊性纤维化中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 5;5(5):CD002011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002011.pub3.
2
Airway clearance techniques compared to no airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis.气道清除技术与囊性纤维化的非气道清除技术比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 12;4(4):CD001401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001401.pub4.
3
Effectiveness of Autogenic Drainage in Improving Pulmonary Function in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.
自身引流对改善囊性纤维化患者肺功能的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3822. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053822.
4
Beneficial short-term effect of autogenic drainage on peripheral resistance in childhood cystic fibrosis disease.自主引流对儿童囊性纤维化疾病外周阻力的短期有益影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02039-2.
5
Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis.自主引流治疗囊性纤维化患者的气道清除。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 15;12(12):CD009595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009595.pub3.
6
Investigating outcome measures for assessing airway clearance techniques in adults with cystic fibrosis: protocol of a single-centre randomised controlled crossover trial.评估成人囊性纤维化气道清除技术的结局指标研究:一项单中心随机对照交叉试验方案。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Oct;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000694.
7
Scaling the Need, Benefits, and Risks Associated with COVID-19 Acute and Postacute Care Rehabilitation: A Review.权衡与新冠病毒病急性及急性后期护理康复相关的需求、益处和风险:一项综述
Rehabil Res Pract. 2020 Aug 26;2020:3642143. doi: 10.1155/2020/3642143. eCollection 2020.
8
Outcome measures for airway clearance techniques in children with chronic obstructive lung diseases: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患儿气道清除技术的结局指标:一项系统综述
Respir Res. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01484-z.
9
Standard (head-down tilt) versus modified (without head-down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis.标准(头低脚高位倾斜)与改良(无头部向下倾斜)体位引流在患有囊性纤维化的婴幼儿中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 9;3(3):CD010297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010297.pub3.
10
The immediate effects of a single autogenic drainage session on ventilatory mechanics in adult subjects with cystic fibrosis.单次自主引流治疗对成年囊性纤维化患者通气力学的即刻影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0195154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195154. eCollection 2018.