• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科临床研究网络:现状、常见挑战及潜在解决方案。

Pediatric clinical research networks: current status, common challenges, and potential solutions.

机构信息

Department of Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Division of Primary Care Research, 141 Northwest Point Blvd, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):740-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3586. Epub 2010 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2009-3586
PMID:20837583
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goals were (1) to describe and to characterize pediatric clinical research networks (PCRNs) in the United States and Canada, (2) to identify PCRN strengths and weaknesses, (3) to evaluate the potential for collaboration among PCRNs, and (4) to assess untapped potential interest in PCRN participation.

METHODS

Data collection included (1) initial identification of PCRNs through an Internet search and word of mouth, (2) follow-up surveys of PCRN leaders, (3) telephone interviews with 21 PCRN leaders, and (4) a survey of 43 American Academy of Pediatrics specialty leaders regarding untapped interest in network research.

RESULTS

Seventy exclusively pediatric networks were identified. Of those, specialty care networks constituted the largest proportion (50%), followed by primary care (28.6%) and disease-specific (21.4%) networks. A network profile survey (response rate: 74.3%) revealed that ∼90% held infrastructure funding. Nearly 75% of respondents viewed cross-network collaborations positively. In-depth telephone interviews corroborated the survey data, with cross-network collaboration mentioned consistently as a theme. American Academy of Pediatrics specialty leaders indicated that up to 30% of current nonparticipants might be interested in research involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric networks exist across the care continuum. Significant numbers of uninvolved practitioners may be interested in joining PCRNs. A strong majority of network leaders cited potential benefits from network collaboration.

摘要

目的

(1)描述和分析美国和加拿大的儿科临床研究网络(PCRN),(2)确定 PCRN 的优势和劣势,(3)评估 PCRN 之间合作的潜力,以及(4)评估对 PCRN 参与的潜在兴趣。

方法

数据收集包括(1)通过互联网搜索和口碑初步确定 PCRN,(2)对 PCRN 负责人进行后续调查,(3)对 21 位 PCRN 负责人进行电话访谈,以及(4)对 43 位美国儿科学会专业负责人进行调查,了解对网络研究的潜在兴趣。

结果

共确定了 70 个专门的儿科网络。其中,专科护理网络构成了最大的比例(50%),其次是初级保健(28.6%)和疾病特异性(21.4%)网络。网络概况调查(回应率:74.3%)显示,约 90%的网络拥有基础设施资金。近 75%的受访者对跨网络合作持积极态度。深入的电话访谈证实了调查数据,跨网络合作被反复提及。美国儿科学会专业负责人表示,多达 30%的当前非参与者可能对研究参与感兴趣。

结论

儿科网络存在于整个医疗保健连续体中。大量未参与的从业者可能有兴趣加入 PCRN。绝大多数网络负责人都提到了网络合作的潜在好处。

相似文献

1
Pediatric clinical research networks: current status, common challenges, and potential solutions.儿科临床研究网络:现状、常见挑战及潜在解决方案。
Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):740-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3586. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
2
Structure and function of emergency care research networks: strengths, weaknesses, and challenges.紧急护理研究网络的结构和功能:优势、劣势和挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):995-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00531.x.
3
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
4
Patient visits to a national practice-based research network: comparing pediatric research in office settings with the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.患者对全国性基于实践的研究网络的访问:将门诊环境中的儿科研究与国家门诊医疗调查进行比较。
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e228-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0701. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
5
Impediments to research in pediatric dermatology: the results of a survey of the members of the society for pediatric dermatology.儿科皮肤病学研究的障碍:儿科皮肤病学会成员调查结果
Pediatr Dermatol. 2010 Jul-Aug;27(4):337-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2010.01162.x. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
6
Unique characteristics of emergency care research: scope, populations, and infrastructure.急诊护理研究的独特特征:范围、人群和基础设施。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):990-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00530.x.
7
The pediatric neurosurgical workforce: defining the current supply. Clinical article.儿科神经外科医疗队伍:确定当前的人员配备。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Jan;3(1):1-10. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.PEDS08255.
8
Signposts along the NIH roadmap for reengineering clinical research: lessons from the Clinical Research Networks initiative.美国国立卫生研究院临床研究再造路线图中的路标:临床研究网络计划的经验教训。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1919-25. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1919.
9
Facilitating emergency care research networks: integration into the Clinical Translational and Science Award (CTSA) infrastructure.促进急诊护理研究网络:融入临床转化与科学奖(CTSA)基础设施。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):1005-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00524.x.
10
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.

引用本文的文献

1
"Common sense is hard work" but benefits from persistent collaboration: Lessons learnt from the development of The Collaborative Network for European Clinical Trials for Children (c4c) to support the conduct of paediatric clinical trials of medicines.“常识需要努力”,但受益于持续的协作:从欧洲儿童临床试验协作网络(c4c)的发展中汲取的经验教训,以支持药品儿科临床试验的开展。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Feb 3;44:101442. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101442. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Leveraging a global, federated, real-world data network to optimize investigator-initiated pediatric clinical trials: the TriNetX Pediatric Collaboratory Network.利用全球联合的真实世界数据网络优化研究者发起的儿科临床试验:TriNetX儿科合作网络
JAMIA Open. 2024 Sep 2;7(3):ooae077. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae077. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
The Family Network Collaborative: engaging families in pediatric critical care research.家庭网络协作组织:让家庭参与儿科重症监护研究。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Feb;93(3):453-456. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02048-1. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Capacity Building for a New Multicenter Network Within the ECHO IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network.为ECHO IDeA州儿科临床试验网络内的新多中心网络进行能力建设。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 14;9:679516. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.679516. eCollection 2021.
5
IDeA States Pediatric Clinical Trials Network for Underserved and Rural Communities.美国儿科临床研究网络为服务欠缺和农村社区服务。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0290. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
6
Innovative approaches to investigator-initiated, multicentre paediatric clinical trials in Canada.加拿大以创新方式开展以研究者为主体、多中心儿科临床试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e029024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029024.
7
The institutional development award states pediatric clinical trials network: building research capacity among the rural and medically underserved.机构发展奖声明:儿科临床试验网络:在农村和医疗服务不足的人群中建立研究能力。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018 Apr;30(2):297-302. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000597.
8
A child abuse research network: Now what?儿童虐待研究网络:接下来该做什么?
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:406-407. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
9
A Cross-Sectional Study of Happiness and Smoking Cessation among Parents.一项关于父母幸福感与戒烟情况的横断面研究。
J Smok Cessat. 2017 Mar;12(1):6-14. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2015.6. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Protecting Children Through Research.通过研究保护儿童。
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2150.