Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
CMAJ. 2010 Oct 19;182(15):1624-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092194. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
Cryotherapy is widely used for the treatment of cutaneous warts in primary care. However, evidence favours salicylic acid application. We compared the effectiveness of these treatments as well as a wait-and-see approach.
Consecutive patients with new cutaneous warts were recruited in 30 primary care practices in the Netherlands between May 1, 2006, and Jan. 26, 2007. We randomly allocated eligible patients to one of three groups: cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen every two weeks, self-application of salicylic acid daily or a wait-and-see approach. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants whose warts were all cured at 13 weeks. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, side effects and treatment satisfaction. Research nurses assessed outcomes during home visits at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.
Of the 250 participants (age 4 to 79 years), 240 were included in the analysis at 13 weeks (loss to follow-up 4%). Cure rates were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29%-51%) in the cryotherapy group, 24% (95% CI 16%-35%) in the salicylic acid group and 16% (95% CI 9.5%-25%) in the wait-and-see group. Differences in effectiveness were most pronounced among participants with common warts (n = 116): cure rates were 49% (95% CI 34%-64%) in the cryotherapy group, 15% (95% CI 7%-30%) in the salicylic acid group and 8% (95% CI 3%-21%) in the wait-and-see group. Cure rates among the participants with plantar warts (n = 124) did not differ significantly between treatment groups.
For common warts, cryotherapy was the most effective therapy in primary care. For plantar warts, we found no clinically relevant difference in effectiveness between cryotherapy, topical application of salicylic acid or a wait-and-see approach after 13 weeks. (ClinicalTrial.gov registration no. ISRCTN42730629).
冷冻疗法广泛应用于初级保健中的皮肤疣治疗。然而,有证据支持水杨酸的应用。我们比较了这些治疗方法以及观望等待的效果。
2006 年 5 月 1 日至 2007 年 1 月 26 日,在荷兰的 30 家初级保健机构连续招募患有新皮肤疣的患者。我们将符合条件的患者随机分配到以下三组之一:每两周接受一次液氮冷冻治疗、自行每日涂抹水杨酸或观望等待。主要结局是在 13 周时所有疣均治愈的参与者比例。分析采用意向治疗。次要结局包括治疗依从性、副作用和治疗满意度。研究护士在第 4、13 和 26 周的家访期间评估结局。
在 250 名参与者(年龄 4 至 79 岁)中,有 240 名在 13 周时(失访 4%)纳入分析。冷冻疗法组的治愈率为 39%(95%置信区间 [CI] 29%-51%),水杨酸组为 24%(95% CI 16%-35%),观望等待组为 16%(95% CI 9.5%-25%)。在有常见疣的参与者中(n = 116),疗效差异最为显著:冷冻疗法组的治愈率为 49%(95% CI 34%-64%),水杨酸组为 15%(95% CI 7%-30%),观望等待组为 8%(95% CI 3%-21%)。足底疣患者(n = 124)的治疗组之间的治愈率无显著差异。
对于常见疣,冷冻疗法是初级保健中最有效的治疗方法。对于足底疣,在 13 周后,我们未发现冷冻疗法、局部涂抹水杨酸或观望等待之间在疗效上存在显著差异。(临床试验注册编号 ISRCTN42730629)。