Suppr超能文献

使用共病的外部测量方法评估 PTSD 症状结构的竞争模型。

An evaluation of competing models for the structure of PTSD symptoms using external measures of comorbidity.

机构信息

National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2010 Oct;23(5):631-8. doi: 10.1002/jts.20559.

Abstract

Research on the structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms has yielded support for two 4-factor models: the King (King, Leskin, King, & Weathers, 1998) and Simms/Watson models (Simms, Watson, & Doebbeling, 2002). This study evaluated them using data drawn from 1,128 Vietnam veterans by comparing associations with a latent internalizing comorbidity variable and five scales from the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales (Tellegen et al., 2003). The Simms/Watson dysphoria factor failed to show evidence of superior convergent or discriminant validity in association with external measures relative to the numbing or hyperarousal factors of the King model. Findings raise questions about proposals to abandon the distinction between numbing and hyperarousal symptoms in favor of a dysphoria-based model.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状结构的研究支持了两种四因素模型:King(King、Leskin、King 和 Weathers,1998)和 Simms/Watson 模型(Simms、Watson 和 Doebbeling,2002)。本研究通过比较与潜在的内在共病变量以及 MMPI-2 重构临床(RC)量表的五个量表的关联,使用来自 1128 名越南退伍军人的数据对这些模型进行了评估(Tellegen 等人,2003 年)。与 King 模型的麻木或过度唤醒因素相比,Simms/Watson 苦恼因素在与外部测量相关联时,没有表现出优越的收敛或区分效度的证据。研究结果对放弃麻木和过度唤醒症状之间的区别,转而支持基于苦恼的模型的提议提出了质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验