School of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Nurs Philos. 2010 Oct;11(4):286-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00458.x.
In exploring phenomenological literature, it is evident that the term 'phenomenology' holds rather different meanings depending upon the context. Phenomenology has been described as both a philosophical movement and an approach to human science research. The phenomenology of Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty was philosophical in nature and not intended to provide rules or procedures for conducting research. The Canadian social scientist, van Manen, however, introduced specific guidelines for conducting human science research, which is rooted in hermeneutic phenomenology and this particular method has been employed in professional disciplines such as education, nursing, clinical psychology, and law. The purpose of this paper is to explore the difference between the phenomenological method as described by van Manen and that of other philosophers such as Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty. In so doing, the author aims to address the blurred boundaries of phenomenology as a research method and as a philosophical movement and highlight the influence of these blurred boundaries on nursing knowledge development.
在探索现象学文献时,很明显,“现象学”一词在不同的语境下具有不同的含义。现象学被描述为一种哲学运动和一种人文科学研究方法。胡塞尔、海德格尔、加达默尔和梅洛-庞蒂的现象学本质上是哲学性的,并不旨在为研究提供规则或程序。然而,加拿大社会学家范梅南却为人文科学研究引入了具体的指导方针,这种方法根植于解释学现象学,并且已经被应用于教育、护理、临床心理学和法律等专业学科中。本文旨在探讨范梅南所描述的现象学方法与胡塞尔、海德格尔、加达默尔和梅洛-庞蒂等哲学家的现象学方法之间的差异。通过这样做,作者旨在解决现象学作为一种研究方法和哲学运动的模糊界限问题,并强调这些模糊界限对护理知识发展的影响。