Suppr超能文献

现象学作为研究方法还是实质性形而上学?现象学在护理中的应用概述。

Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenology's uses in nursing.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Philos. 2010 Oct;11(4):286-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00458.x.

Abstract

In exploring phenomenological literature, it is evident that the term 'phenomenology' holds rather different meanings depending upon the context. Phenomenology has been described as both a philosophical movement and an approach to human science research. The phenomenology of Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty was philosophical in nature and not intended to provide rules or procedures for conducting research. The Canadian social scientist, van Manen, however, introduced specific guidelines for conducting human science research, which is rooted in hermeneutic phenomenology and this particular method has been employed in professional disciplines such as education, nursing, clinical psychology, and law. The purpose of this paper is to explore the difference between the phenomenological method as described by van Manen and that of other philosophers such as Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty. In so doing, the author aims to address the blurred boundaries of phenomenology as a research method and as a philosophical movement and highlight the influence of these blurred boundaries on nursing knowledge development.

摘要

在探索现象学文献时,很明显,“现象学”一词在不同的语境下具有不同的含义。现象学被描述为一种哲学运动和一种人文科学研究方法。胡塞尔、海德格尔、加达默尔和梅洛-庞蒂的现象学本质上是哲学性的,并不旨在为研究提供规则或程序。然而,加拿大社会学家范梅南却为人文科学研究引入了具体的指导方针,这种方法根植于解释学现象学,并且已经被应用于教育、护理、临床心理学和法律等专业学科中。本文旨在探讨范梅南所描述的现象学方法与胡塞尔、海德格尔、加达默尔和梅洛-庞蒂等哲学家的现象学方法之间的差异。通过这样做,作者旨在解决现象学作为一种研究方法和哲学运动的模糊界限问题,并强调这些模糊界限对护理知识发展的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验