Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1384-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01480.x.
Using social-cognitive domain theory and social identity theory, tolerance judgments of practices by Muslim actors among Dutch adolescents (12-17) were investigated. The findings for Study 1 (N=180) demonstrated that participants evaluated 4 practices using different types of reasons: personal, social-conventional, and moral. In Study 2 (N=970), participants were more tolerant of acts considered to be a personal issue than of acts that pertained to moral issues (social-conventional acts were in the middle). Furthermore, participants were more tolerant of the particular practices than of campaigns for public support of co-Muslims for these practices. Level of education, in-group identification, and multiculturalism had much weaker effects in the moral than in the other domains. Age was negatively related to tolerance.
运用社会认知领域理论和社会认同理论,研究了荷兰青少年(12-17 岁)对穆斯林行为者的行为的宽容判断。研究 1(N=180)的结果表明,参与者使用不同类型的理由来评估 4 种行为:个人、社会常规和道德。在研究 2(N=970)中,参与者对被认为是个人问题的行为比对涉及道德问题的行为更宽容(社会常规行为处于中间)。此外,参与者对特定行为的宽容程度比对支持穆斯林共同行为的公众支持运动的宽容程度更高。与其他领域相比,教育水平、内群体认同和多元文化主义对道德领域的影响要小得多。年龄与宽容呈负相关。