Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126, USA.
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1445-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01484.x.
This study examined whether 17-year-old adolescents (n=189) and their parents reconstructed their memory for an adolescent-parent laboratory conflict over a 6-week period as a function of adolescent attachment organization. It also compared participants' perceptions of conflict over time to observational ratings of the conflict to further characterize the nature of the attachment-related memory biases that emerged. Secure adolescents reconstructed interactions with each parent more favorably over time, whereas insecure adolescents showed less favorable reconstructive memory. Likewise, mothers of secure girls reconstructed conflicts more favorably over time, whereas mothers of insecure boys showed less favorable reconstructive memory. Participant ratings were associated with observational ratings in theoretically consistent ways. Contrary to expectations, fathers showed no attachment-related memory biases.
本研究考察了 17 岁青少年（n=189）及其父母是否会随着时间的推移重建对青少年与父母实验室冲突的记忆，这取决于青少年的依恋组织。它还比较了参与者随时间推移对冲突的看法与对冲突的观察性评估，以进一步描述出现的与依恋相关的记忆偏差的性质。安全型青少年随着时间的推移对与每一位父母的互动重建得更为有利，而不安全型青少年的记忆重建则不太有利。同样，安全型女孩的母亲随着时间的推移对冲突的重建更为有利，而不安全型男孩的母亲则不太有利。参与者的评价与观察性评价以理论一致的方式相关联。与预期相反，父亲没有表现出与依恋相关的记忆偏差。
