Suppr超能文献

在虚拟国际卒中试验档案(VISTA)中,比较既往卒中合并糖尿病患者溶栓治疗后的结局。

Comparison of outcomes following thrombolytic therapy among patients with prior stroke and diabetes in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).

机构信息

Acute Stroke Unit, University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Gardiner Institute, Western Infirmary and Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2531-7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1125. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The use of alteplase in patients who have had a prior stroke and concomitant diabetes is not approved in Europe. To examine the influence of diabetes and prior stroke on outcomes, we compared data on thrombolysed patients with nonthrombolysed comparators.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We selected patients with ischemic stroke on whom we had data on age, pretreatment baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (b-NIHSS), and 90-day outcome measures (functional modified Rankin score [mRS]) and neurological measures [NIHSS]) in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive. We compared outcomes between thrombolysed patients and nonthrombolysed comparators in those with and without diabetes, those who have had a prior stroke, or both and report findings using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test and proportional odds logistic regression analyses. We report an age-adjusted and b-NIHSS-adjusted CMH P value and odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

Rankin data were available for 5,817 patients: 1,585 thrombolysed patients and 4,232 nonthrombolysed comparators. A total 1,334 (24.1%) patients had diabetes, 1,898 (33.7%) patients have had a prior stroke, and 491 (8%) patients had both. Diabetes and nondiabetes had equal b-NIHSS (median 13; P = 0.3), but patients who have had a prior stroke had higher b-NIHSS than patients who have not had a prior stroke (median 13 vs. 12; P < 0.0001). Functional outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among both nondiabetic (P < 0.0001; OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3-1.6]) and diabetic (P = 0.1; 1.3 [1.05-1.6 ]) subjects. Similarly, outcomes were better for thrombolysed patients versus nonthrombolysed comparators among who have not had a prior stroke (P < 0.0001; 1.4 [1.2-1.6 ]) and those who have (P = 0.02; 1.3 [1.04-1.6 ]). There was no interaction of diabetes and prior stroke with treatment (P = 0.8). Neurological outcomes were consistent with the mRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes from thrombolysis are better among patients with diabetes and/or those who have had a prior stroke than in control subjects. Withholding thrombolytic treatment from otherwise-eligible patients may not be justified.

摘要

目的

在欧洲,阿替普酶不能用于有既往卒中史和合并糖尿病的患者。为了研究糖尿病和既往卒中对预后的影响,我们比较了溶栓患者和未溶栓对照组的数据。

研究设计和方法

我们从虚拟国际卒中试验档案中选择了有缺血性卒中且有年龄、治疗前基线国立卫生研究院卒中量表(b-NIHSS)和 90 天预后指标(改良 Rankin 量表[mRS])和神经学指标[NIHSS])数据的患者。我们比较了有和无糖尿病、有既往卒中史或两者兼有患者中溶栓患者和未溶栓对照组的预后,并使用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel(CMH)检验和比例优势逻辑回归分析报告结果。我们报告了年龄调整和 b-NIHSS 调整后的 CMH P 值和比值比(OR)。

结果

5817 例患者的 Rankin 数据可用:1585 例溶栓患者和 4232 例未溶栓对照组。共有 1334 例(24.1%)患者患有糖尿病,1898 例(33.7%)患者有既往卒中史,491 例(8%)患者同时患有这两种疾病。糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的 b-NIHSS 相同(中位数 13;P=0.3),但有既往卒中史的患者的 b-NIHSS 高于无既往卒中史的患者(中位数 13 比 12;P<0.0001)。与未溶栓对照组相比,在非糖尿病患者(P<0.0001;OR 1.4[95%CI 1.3-1.6])和糖尿病患者(P=0.1;1.3[1.05-1.6])中,溶栓患者的功能预后更好。同样,在无既往卒中史的患者(P<0.0001;1.4[1.2-1.6])和有既往卒中史的患者(P=0.02;1.3[1.04-1.6])中,溶栓患者的预后也优于未溶栓对照组。糖尿病和既往卒中与治疗之间无交互作用(P=0.8)。神经学结果与 mRS 一致。

结论

与对照组相比,有糖尿病和/或既往卒中的溶栓患者的预后更好。对于其他符合条件的患者,不进行溶栓治疗可能是不合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a8/2992183/7a8219a3724e/zdc0121086160001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验